Damn it blizzard won
I was really hoping Honorbuddy would have beat them
Sad day
What do you mean?
Damn it blizzard won
I was really hoping Honorbuddy would have beat them
Sad day
Damn it blizzard won
I was really hoping Honorbuddy would have beat them
Sad day
Maybe bossland knows stuff but he said he doesn't to trick Blizzard, because they probably read this forum...
![]()
What do you mean?
on a certain unnanmed website that offers an unofficial version of HB they were able to make honorbuddy available to select users post-banwave and those users reported that their accounts were banned, which strongly implies the detection is still active.
this is not good news
They may have that access, but considering how much data of that type is being generated at any given moment, I wonder if they have the computer to effectively track it.There is one aspect of botting detection that I havent seen discussed or mention on any thread that ive read. Server side detection has normally been addressed as it relates to afk bots using and repeating the same pathing on the world map. Then with search algorithm they can conclude with a high degree of accuracy whether it is a human or a bot at the helm. However it is possible that blizz is also using server side detection to catch "super efficcient" combat routines. Think about a 15 min raid encounter where a bot is casting spells right at the GCD availability for extended period of time. Im sure blizzard has access to their own server side combat logs.
Actually, I wonder if that may not be what they did... there was mention from some report that they only banned if botting between April 29th and May 7th. If they took all that data and gave it to a cloud computer provider and had them parse the logs, it might take a week of crunching, resulting in a ban on the 13th. It is feasible that it was logged data...They may have that access, but considering how much data of that type is being generated at any given moment, I wonder if they have the computer to effectively track it.
They may have that access, but considering how much data of that type is being generated at any given moment, I wonder if they have the computer to effectively track it.
Actually, I wonder if that may not be what they did... there was mention from some report that they only banned if botting between April 29th and May 7th. If they took all that data and gave it to a cloud computer provider and had them parse the logs, it might take a week of crunching, resulting in a ban on the 13th. It is feasible that it was logged data...
then other bots and 64bits scripts would have been hit aswell. but no only HB users was hit.
Please, for the sake of simple common sense, give us a x64 version of HB. We should be taking every step possible to hide ourselves amongst the 80%+ x64 users (90%+ in Europe). I know that the DEV's have said they won't consider it, but even an old fart like myself can see that we're going to stand out like a nun in a brothel if we stick to x86.
Please, for the sake of simple common sense, give us a x64 version of HB. We should be taking every step possible to hide ourselves amongst the 80%+ x64 users (90%+ in Europe). I know that the DEV's have said they won't consider it, but even an old fart like myself can see that we're going to stand out like a nun in a brothel if we stick to x86.