What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
RebornBuddy Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Honorbuddy v2.5.14035.788

Status
Not open for further replies.
get_back_to_work_by_mikemeth-d579eok.jpg
 
Honorbuddy stops working after
[20:40:52.144 N] Honorbuddy v2.5.14035.788 started.
[20:40:53.700 N] Logging in...
[20:40:53.934 N] T: 5247368714964544258 H: 3002729843

Fresh install and run the .exe in admin...
 
I did still stops at Checking for Buddy Store products....

Anyone else having this issue?
 
Im waiting at the same spot too, maybe is because we are trying to log at the same time?
 
alt+tab to get to whatever is holding you up. windows authorization, cr selection, something.
 
Getting loads of LUA errors. Example (character names replaced with xxx).

Code: 
1447x [string "WoW.lua"]:57: attempt to index global 'YtLXceQkBYo' (a nil value)
[string "WoW.lua"]:57: in function `ycFYz'
[string "WoW.lua"]:26: in function <[string "WoW.lua"]:7>


Locals:
self = <unnamed> {
 0 = <userdata>
}
event = "COMBAT_LOG_EVENT_UNFILTERED"
zNqRPfyxEZq = <table> {
 1 = 1432674064.355
 2 = "SPELL_AURA_REMOVED"
 3 = false
 4 = "Player-XXXX-XXXXXX"
 5 = "xxx"
 6 = 1352
 7 = 0
 8 = "Player-XXXX-XXXXXX"
 9 = "xxx"
 10 = 1352
 11 = 0
 12 = 167188
 13 = "Inspiring Presence"
 14 = 1
 15 = "BUFF"
}
VRaNNGGKpgrslHM = 0
qvFQyHyajYgEISs = true
VLCFnICHeaQqJsX = <table> {
 QfzSpHiPKIls = <table> {
 }
}
(for generator) = <function> defined =[C]:-1
(for state) = <table> {
 1 = <table> {
 }
 2 = <table> {
 }
}
(for control) = 1
i = 1
v = <table> {
 qCnKZV = 1
 ycFYz = <function> defined WoW.lua:50
}

Wee bit nervous to continue to use like this... is it HB or the routine im using?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Raphus,

Slightly unrelated but the buddystore image in your OP leads to a blank tab. Might just be a problem on my end but thought I would throw that out there (Possibly throwing myself to the hounds for even mentioning it since it's easily navigated to by other means but yeah.)
 
All is good now, raping hard again thanks guys, I feel it now, it will be a long night.
 
Yeah sure,they need to completely rewrite warden for that,good luck.It will give us time to breath.

There was some post that the guy who made the "thing" that looks for honorbuddy left blizzard on the other hand.

Whatever,it doesn't matter.
 
scarar said:
It was get pass the Buddy Store ... Not sure way...
Click to expand...

Not on my home pc right now but there is a "bossland" folder somewhere at C:\Users\[USERNAME]\AppData\Local
Delete the folder and restart HB. That solved my problem back in the days.
 
flyg said:
Getting loads of LUA errors. Example (character names replaced with xxx).

Code: 
1447x [string "WoW.lua"]:57: attempt to index global 'YtLXceQkBYo' (a nil value)
[string "WoW.lua"]:57: in function `ycFYz'
[string "WoW.lua"]:26: in function <[string "WoW.lua"]:7>


Locals:
self = <unnamed> {
 0 = <userdata>
}
event = "COMBAT_LOG_EVENT_UNFILTERED"
zNqRPfyxEZq = <table> {
 1 = 1432674064.355
 2 = "SPELL_AURA_REMOVED"
 3 = false
 4 = "Player-XXXX-XXXXXX"
 5 = "xxx"
 6 = 1352
 7 = 0
 8 = "Player-XXXX-XXXXXX"
 9 = "xxx"
 10 = 1352
 11 = 0
 12 = 167188
 13 = "Inspiring Presence"
 14 = 1
 15 = "BUFF"
}
VRaNNGGKpgrslHM = 0
qvFQyHyajYgEISs = true
VLCFnICHeaQqJsX = <table> {
 QfzSpHiPKIls = <table> {
 }
}
(for generator) = <function> defined =[C]:-1
(for state) = <table> {
 1 = <table> {
 }
 2 = <table> {
 }
}
(for control) = 1
i = 1
v = <table> {
 qCnKZV = 1
 ycFYz = <function> defined WoW.lua:50
}

Wee bit nervous to continue to use like this... is it HB or the routine im using?
Click to expand...

Thanks for the report, we're working on a fix.
 
zeroed said:
I don't wanna be a troll,but why no 64 bit?
Click to expand...

Because a huge part of the userbase uses x86 bits windows, with x64 they wouldn't be able to use it on their x86 OS, x86 is more pratical and doesn't make it less secure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top