Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
.45 bot has healed full health minion when there was a minion that wasn't full hp and hero as well was damaged. i've seen this happen with holy light and earthen ring farseer multiple times with both cards so far.
I feel this should behave like Demon Buddy. The basic "logic" is just that BASIC, every thing works, but BASIC. the User needs to be able to write scripts/profiles that behave a certain way depending on the deck and style the deck is. I feel that what we are telling the buddy team is so different per person that the logic shouldn't be continuously changed.
Basic Logic needs to be written into the Bot and then let us create profiles for the extended and circumstantial logic.
I feel that all we are doing is giving our input on how the bot SHOULD behave in certain situations, or what cards SHOULD be played before what cards if cards and if this and if that and if that. This should all be done profile wise.
Enemy had 3/2 taunt on board, bot had many minions including 2/1 lepper gnome that could kill that taunt - instead he choose that there is no target for it so he just finished turn.
Enemy had 6/5 taunt on board. Bot had 1/3 taunt on board, then dropped 4/2 arcane golem, attacked 6/5 taunt with 1/3 taunt and when enemy had 6/4 taunt he did nothing with that fresh arcane golem with charge - end turn.
Would you be able to add an option to stop the bot after 30 wins?
And would it be possible to make the bot switch decks every 5 or any looses to make it appear less unhuman. We all know that when we play and loose too much we kind of have the habbit of switching deck.
When bot have 2 cards with normal priority and he can only play one of them he should play the card with higher mana cost. For example: bot have 3 mana and 2 cards - 2 mana 3/2 and 3 mana 3/3 - he should play the card with higher cost so that he will use that mana efficiently.
Or are there any other factors that are calculated and because of that bot decided that 2 mana mob is better play?
Enemy had 8/4 taunt on field bot had 4/2 stealth ready to attack, dropped another 5/7 with charge and yet he did not attack with either of them because there was no target for them.
About Power Overwhelming - bot attacked with creature and after that attack he used Power Overwhelming on that creature.
Bot had 7 mana and 3 cards on hand - wolfrider and 2x shattered sun cleric - he played shattered sun cleric on empty board and then another one to buff the first one. He should have played wolfrider and buff it with cleric instead.
Starving buzzard doesnt seem to know that animal companion is a beast. If starving buzzard and animal companion can both be played the same turn, starving buzzard ought to go first.
I am new to the forum so I hope this is the right place for this.
Bot trades many small minions into large taunts instead of large attack minions.
Enemy has a 3/3 taunt.
I have a 1/1 with divine shield, 1/1 vanilla, and a 3/3 with taunt.
Bot attacks first with the 1/1 divine shield, popping the shield for nothing. Then attacks with the vanilla 1/1, trading 1 for nothing. Finally attacks with the 3/3, killing both.