What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit API Documentation
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic

[Tripwire Spam Thread] anyone cant login DB? tripwire ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Same here now ! At least we know they are working on it . Im sure that when its ready we can start botting !:)
 
I launch DB but nothing happends.. What can i do to get it to work? Downloaded a fresh new version but still the DB wont start, dont even get a logg in..
 
Posted in the official thread.

We are aware of the crashes being
caused by the new versions of the bots and working on a fix right now.

New builds will be pushed asap.
 
DiscoDancer said:
Was diablo 3 providing extra revenues via the auction house or selling gold? yes, was there an economic incentive for blizzard to clamp down swiftly on people taking away it's profits? yes.
Grab the drunkard's walk by Leonard Mlodinow, it will help clean up that dirty A=B thinking when in reality A=1 and B=2.
Click to expand...

You could sell gold and items through the RMAH which converted to blizzard dollars. This could then be transferred from your blizzard dollars to paypal. Blizzard gets their cut from this as a flat rate, regardless of whether or not the account is being botted. The only incentive on blizzards side is to clean up bots because money is involved, so if they want a good public image they have to police.

Not everyone sold their gold through third party sites, I and others used the RMAH to do just that. Really you are just arguing to argue at this point because you would rather not agree that its entirely possible his 6-7bans came while botting with demonbuddy on diablo3.

As far as to read a book, I don't need to read a book to understand how or how not a person may have been banned during the existence of demonbuddy. I get that some may say that A=1 and B=2. A and B in infinite scenarios are not equal, yet A and B in infinite scenarios are equal. Funny how that works, when you put more constraints then sure, if A has a definite value of 1 and B has a definite value of 2 then, A!=B.

So really, to the actual point, his 6-7 bans are plausible. They may not be BS if they happened while the RMAH was active. That is my point, you have not disproved it you are just throwing a ball down a hallway and telling me to chase it. Hoping that by the time I return with the ball I won't remember what was going on.
 
as i said before probably 5/6th of the diablo community bots. and over 1 or 2 accounts only. why ban when less then 1/3 would rebuy the game.


edit: so you ban 10,000 people and 3000 rebuy the game.. great you made the company 30-60k$ yet lost 6000 players and potential upgraders in the future.


^^^^ these are just rough numbers and purly for point proving purposes ^^^
 
Last edited:
i just bot as normal already back to grinding rifts. if your banned your banned.. live it up while you can... either way i always go 100% balls out or don't bot at all
 
I updated to the .453 version and it is working literally flawlessly.

Also of note, in the ~5min it took me to DL, extract, replace and finally run the new version, the .453 thread was already gone, and just the .452 was left.

Idk what that means but I guess idc hah. If you can get ahold of the .453 version, do it. works for me!

gl hf
 
Maybe I'm just dumb, but I can't wrap my head around how the admins wrote the update releases of the new Warden modules. You have here one of the only bots that injects into the client's memory, which is cool, but also the most prone to detection. Then claims that another bot (and a HUD) which don't inject into memory can also be detected (still with you there, a simple scan of processes could reveal idiots who don't even rename their exe files even though that's not much protection). But what boggles my mind is now they claim Demonbuddy is safe against detection and the other two aren't? Was Demonbuddy rewritten over night from the ground up to no longer inject code? I'm really just curious because either Demonbuddy isn't as safe to bot right now as it's being advertised, or they're overplaying how "dangerous" it is to use the other bot and/or HUD.
 
widds said:
Maybe I'm just dumb, but I can't wrap my head around how the admins wrote the update releases of the new Warden modules. You have here one of the only bots that injects into the client's memory, which is cool, but also the most prone to detection. Then claims that another bot (and a HUD) which don't inject into memory can also be detected (still with you there, a simple scan of processes could reveal idiots who don't even rename their exe files even though that's not much protection). But what boggles my mind is now they claim Demonbuddy is safe against detection and the other two aren't? Was Demonbuddy rewritten over night from the ground up to no longer inject code? I'm really just curious because either Demonbuddy isn't as safe to bot right now as it's being advertised, or they're overplaying how "dangerous" it is to use the other bot and/or HUD.
Click to expand...


I gave that some thought as well. I came to the quick conclusion that IDGAF.

We cant expect the devs to tell us "what they did" anyways, as that would just toss
their work out the damn window.

I have two accounts, a main which I used to bot endlessly up until a few weeks ago
and a new account which ive been botting on 24/7 since. It's kind of a shit or get off the pot situation.

If you dont feel that you can trust the devs and are worried about getting the hammer, you should
just give up botting. ezpz
 
Bon Appétit

New build available

And with that, we're closing this thread. It has served its purpose.


cheers & happy botting,
chinajade
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top