What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
RebornBuddy Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Release] Complete AdvancedItemFilter - Save only item with good affixes. !!Beta!!

ploxie said:
I'm having trouble with the plugin.
1) The bot is trying to do the Chaos Recipe, but it doesn't have all the items. It just opens all the tabs and then repeats.
Sometimes it just works stopping and starting the bot again, but sometimes I have to close the bot and restart...
I've tried all I could find that would help, but it still fails sometimes.

Is there anything else I should do?
Other than that I LOVE the plugin!

2) btw, I would love to see a plugin where you can organize your items a bit better, as your plugin can do with currency and some other stuff^^
Click to expand...

Alright so :

1) Which item is he missing ? I need to know that, there was some flaws in the code I just fixed (like few seconds ago) I need to work on the error handling as I did in the Identification feature coming in the next build, so the bot don't "stop/start" when an error is found.

2) It's supposed to fill the needs, you can stash currencies in their own tabs, quality gems, recipe items, 5L items, scraps & scrolls...

The upcoming version (I need to debug lot of things) will also allow you to set number of pieces of gear for recipes of each type.
<troll>
DBF also helps me in some ways to handle few things, but is also being a dick and telling me things don't work, when they do, so I need to understand why this deer can't make it.
</troll>

I need to run the plugin in a VM so I can make sure it runs well because some people will whine "hey it doesn't do shit in my vm, why" so it needs to be flawless (or almost)

If you can provide full logs, so I can see if anything related to AIF goes wrong. Thanks all
 
toNyx, i'll be online later, with a great will to help.

Let this deer make it! :) lol

/hat
 
alcor75 said:
toNyx, i'll be online later, with a great will to help.

Let this deer make it! :) lol

/hat
Click to expand...

More teasing !

1e2b3b9537.png
 
DeliciousCyanide said:
I'm surprised that you're still working so hard on the GUI. After pushebx mentioned changing over to a new gui base I stopped coding anything GUI intensive. Props to you though for doing it regardless :)
Click to expand...
Hey DeliciousCyanide,
You learn things, even if it's redundant, hence why I've been doing GUI stuff too.
True, that mahApps will look like, but you need to understand the underlying concept to use it effectively =).
 
darkbluefirefly said:
Hey DeliciousCyanide,
You learn things, even if it's redundant, hence why I've been doing GUI stuff too.
True, that mahApps will look like, but you need to understand the underlying concept to use it effectively =).
Click to expand...
I've done a lot of work with .net before. The current GUI system for plugins is just irksome for me at the moment because of the lack of visual representation of where objects are being placed. Constantly restarting and reloading the plugin is just so much of a hassle for me and I don't distribute any of my stuff so I can just lazy man edit it :) ... in hindsight I could probably do it in M$VS and then port it over. I dunno, laziness.
 
DeliciousCyanide said:
I've done a lot of work with .net before. The current GUI system for plugins is just irksome for me at the moment because of the lack of visual representation of where objects are being placed. Constantly restarting and reloading the plugin is just so much of a hassle for me and I don't distribute any of my stuff so I can just lazy man edit it :) ... in hindsight I could probably do it in M$VS and then port it over. I dunno, laziness.
Click to expand...

The only things that will change in MahApps is the concept and the structure, the "idea" will still be the same, it's only part of the migration. And WPF has so much fun things to deal with.
And if I'm still working on the GUI, is because if I release a primary build now people will get lost and ask for the same features again and again. so it's sort of an anticipation :D

most of the stuff is working, today I install the computer in the new flat and run it for few hours, if it's good and don't have any flaws/crashes, expect a build, since I don't have much stuff to add anymore, things are pretty good as it is now. (After that I'll probably add a GCP recipe task)

As a proof it's almost fully working, I ran accidentally 24 hours straight with it enabled, went back to it and noticed, did all the stuff I could to shuffle currency to avoid any losses, and somehow discovered 10 exalts worth of currency :D
 
toNyx said:
More teasing !

1e2b3b9537.png
Click to expand...

The hype is real! Looking forward to next build.

Just a question with this concept though. If say I wanted the bot ID crit or chaos implicit rings and leave the rest un-ID, would I need to set that up in my standard Itemfilter? And if so, would yours not overrule it?
 
lyvewyre said:
The hype is real! Looking forward to next build.

Just a question with this concept though. If say I wanted the bot ID crit or chaos implicit rings and leave the rest un-ID, would I need to set that up in my standard Itemfilter? And if so, would yours not overrule it?
Click to expand...

Yep, the recipe thingy will override this filter since our evaluator ticks first.

But you can still add a specific filter in the evaluator yourself (with a bit of c# knowledge) because atm I'll stop upgrading the GUI, because it works as I need it to and I don't wanna add sort of a "custom rule creator" in it with the upcoming migration to MahApps.

If you add ID filters on top of the filtering before the recipes kicks in, you'll return a value and obviously override the chaos recipe checks.
 
toNyx said:
Yup, somehow it happened to me like few hours ago.



Want to exclude 6S from protection?
Click to expand...

Well it is 7 jewels versus a few alteration shards using another rare chest. I'd prefer it to vendor the 6s than use it for the recipe.
 
lyvewyre said:
Well it is 7 jewels versus a few alteration shards using another rare chest. I'd prefer it to vendor the 6s than use it for the recipe.
Click to expand...

if it's protected for a recipe then it's 2c, not 7jews
But I can exclude them... as you wish
 
toNyx said:
if it's protected for a recipe then it's 2c, not 7jews
But I can exclude them... as you wish
Click to expand...

What I'm talking about is the opportunity cost of using the 6s in a recipe versus using another unID. In that case, the opportunity cost is 7 jewels from vendoring the 6s versus some alt shards for a different random chest. Whether you use the 6s or not you are still getting 2c.
 
7 Jew is like 1 chaos)
so you loose 1 chaos to get 2 chaos
Today he sell 2 times
 
darlack said:
7 Jew is like 1 chaos)
so you loose 1 chaos to get 2 chaos
Today he sell 2 times
Click to expand...

Well, you say that because you don't run hard as we do, and we probably don't care about losing 1 chaos lol :D but if you want I can remove the 6S rares from the checks. That's a matter of few lines
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top