Question - I heard stories and know of a way to fix this.

[99dsimonp]

People in today's society don't have what we call sense anymore. It should be called "Sense" because common sense isn't so common anymore from what I've seen.

You may have some good points, but your hauteur is disturbingly annoying. I wouldn't want the devs to spend time with such a feature (yet) anyway. If people don't want their friends to join it can be turned off as previously mentioned - and we still have no clue if what you're claiming is true or not.
I would, however, suggest you to try to be a little more humble the next time you report something like this - instead of calling everybody idiots and whatnot.

 

[PapaBash]

How can you guys be too ignorant to discuss something properly? There is no bad side to his idea. If you don't run a follower, although I wouldn't know why you would not care for extra Goldfind, then don't get the plugin?

Obviously there are flaws to his idea of execution, however the general idea to look into it, even if it just spares 1 of 100 of our accounts, why not? A GM will still need to do a connection and there is almost guaranteed to be some kind of information. Where humans are at work, there are errors to be expected, errors that could save some of our accounts.

So instead of bullshitting around with tinfoils, paranoia and stuff, think about a possible giveaways to gms, or if we can cheaply add human behaviour to our bot.

When he is invisible, he needs to see, that we are botting and the only real way I would know is if the the combat is not optimized enough or backpaddling. If those are fixed, then he will be forced to talk to us to really make sure we aren't a bot and then this idea here to scan for chat/follower or whatever has merits.

 

[DTrick]

How can you guys be too ignorant to discuss something properly? There is no bad side to his idea. If you don't run a follower, although I wouldn't know why you would not care for extra Goldfind, then don't get the plugin?

Obviously there are flaws to his idea of execution, however the general idea to look into it, even if it just spares 1 of 100 of our accounts, why not? A GM will still need to do a connection and there is almost guaranteed to be some kind of information. Where humans are at work, there are errors to be expected, errors that could save some of our accounts.

So instead of bullshitting around with tinfoils, paranoia and stuff, think about a possible giveaways to gms, or if we can cheaply add human behaviour to our bot.

When he is invisible, he needs to see, that we are botting and the only real way I would know is if the the combat is not optimized enough or backpaddling. If those are fixed, then he will be forced to talk to us to really make sure we aren't a bot and then this idea here to scan for chat/follower or whatever has merits.

No point dude they wont agree. Its the same answers i get when i say the following.

I tell people that i use diff IP's (Proxie socks5) elite proxies per Bot "Client." They then reply with this answer: No you don't need to use diff ips are you stupid? they only ban via account name.
I then go on stupidly telling them its not about being banned via the IP. its what u can do after the account has been banned. People don't think out of the box.

I come off harshly on the internet because of the tone others come off at me.

What good would this add?
Checks follower in case it needs to be rehired
Checks for chat/follower left because of Dev/Player Join to behave diffrently to help ensure anti afk detection.
(Shit if you wanted to get a bit more advanced you could setup a chat scaning system to prowl the chatbox and if it catches keywords it would respond to the person messaging with set replys, Such like Alice AI)

Please list the bad in this idea..