What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

Blizzard loot

Anonuzer01

Active Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
947
Reaction score
26
I just watched my bot pick up a level 62 item. The stats: 1 empty socket. That's it. Nothing else. Blizzard sure did a poor job with their loot system.
 
I just watched my bot pick up a level 62 item. The stats: 1 empty socket. That's it. Nothing else. Blizzard sure did a poor job with their loot system.
so every item that drops is supposed to be useful/good? that would be doing a poor job on their loot system.
 
yea the loot system sucks ass, good thing i got DB
 
poor loot = more item and gold sold for $$$

As a player i dont like that
As a farmer i like that :D
 
Not sure about loot being broken, but their MF definitely is... I'm finding more legendaries/better items on an account with 60%mf than I am on another with 256%.
 
I guess his point was that a item with iLvL62 with only a socket without any stats....
We all know the looted items are often bad. But 1 single socket is enough for being an 62 iLvl...
 
Not sure about loot being broken, but their MF definitely is... I'm finding more legendaries/better items on an account with 60%mf than I am on another with 256%.

If you ever took a college level statistics course, or ever played live/online poker, you would realize how ignorant this statement is.
 
Loot sucks when legendaries are shit, and they are.

shield.png


This shield would like to have a word with you.
And it isn't the only one!
 
Are you colourblind? That shield is not legendary and thus you should reread what he wrote.
 
If you ever took a college level statistics course, or ever played live/online poker, you would realize how ignorant this statement is.

I love when incompetent kids try to talk shit? You might want to attend a college that uses books with pages if you?re deriving conclusions from statements that supply next to no information.

?Statistics? and ?Poker/cards? typically have a mathematical constant, where-as a program can have errors.
It?s ignorant to assume I didn?t allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before observing how discrepant the accounts were. So unless you?re basing your comment on the infinite monkey theorem or have a retort involving such; you can pull your underwear up, because I?m done with your asshole bitch.
 
Are you colourblind? That shield is not legendary and thus you should reread what he wrote.

If your are ditching rares then you are stupid.
If you are thinking Legendaries are the only possible dropds from Sarkoth then you are stupid.
If you think loot sucks because "Legendaries are shit" then you are stupid.

TL;DR
You are stupid.
 
I love when incompetent kids try to talk shit… You might want to attend a college that uses books with pages if you’re deriving conclusions from statements that supply next to no information.

“Statistics” and “Poker/cards” typically have a mathematical constant, where-as a program can have errors.
It’s ignorant to assume I didn’t allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before observing how discrepant the accounts were. So unless you’re basing your comment on the infinite monkey theorem or have a retort involving such; you can pull your underwear up, because I’m done with your asshole bitch.



You sir are a douchebag, just to get that out of the way, as we have already seen in several threads.


Now for the part in red. Programs have no errors, programmers leave errors, the program itself only does what it is programmed to do. Then again if you went to a real college with books you would understand the only limitation to a program is the people who write it.
 
You sir are a douchebag, just to get that out of the way, as we have already seen in several threads.

Now for the part in red. Programs have no errors, programmers leave errors, the program itself only does what it is programmed to do. Then again if you went to a real college with books you would understand the only limitation to a program is the people who write it.

Right, I'm a douche for replying to someone calling my statements ignorant for no reason? Sorry, I'm not a timid bitch that walks around with their head down, afraid to make eye contact who says "I guess" in response to everything like you.
I've helped many people on the forum and only defend my posts with hostility when people like you feel the need to punctuate borderline coherent posts with a random insult. "Several threads?" Here's a link to refresh your memory since you're barely literate yourself and can't retain much of what you read. (Can't purchase new key)

As for
Programs have no errors, programmers leave errors, the program itself only does what it is programmed to do.
You're a fucking genius... you don't say? I left "errors" ambiguous for people that made it past a 3rd grade reading level and have some sense of comprehension. "Programs" can be poorly written as well as conflict with other "programs, lines of code, scripts etc." Now hop off my nuts until you have something meaningful to contribute.
 
If your are ditching rares then you are stupid.
If you are thinking Legendaries are the only possible dropds from Sarkoth then you are stupid.
If you think loot sucks because "Legendaries are shit" then you are stupid.

TL;DR
You are stupid.
facepalm. You have the reading comprehension of a 2 year old. Items are called Legendaries because they are supposed to be LEGENDARY. In D2 uniques were some of the best items in the game (runewords and perfectly rolled rares being the other) and when you saw that gold text after Baal dropped you got excited. The only time people get excited for legendaries in D3 is something like a justice lantern, stormshield or a skullgrasp drop. 95% of legendaries are worse than a decently rolled ilvl 63 rare. This is a loot game, you're supposed to have fun searching for loot and finding that god tier item after all that work and legendaries should be some of those items, not some random rare.

Also your rare shield isn't that great. 15% block rate? that's the most important stat on a shield and your's is garbage.
 
Last edited:
Right, I'm a douche for replying to someone calling my statements ignorant for no reason? Sorry, I'm not a timid bitch that walks around with their head down, afraid to make eye contact who says "I guess" in response to everything like you.
I've helped many people on the forum and only defend my posts with hostility when people like you feel the need to punctuate borderline coherent posts with a random insult. "Several threads?" Here's a link to refresh your memory since you're barely literate yourself and can't retain much of what you read. (Can't purchase new key)

As for
You're a fucking genius... you don't say? I left "errors" ambiguous for people that made it past a 3rd grade reading level and have some sense of comprehension. "Programs" can be poorly written as well as conflict with other "programs, lines of code, scripts etc." Now hop off my nuts until you have something meaningful to contribute.

Back to why I opened my last post with the first comment.
 
Unlike in the thread Mirbz linked, I agree with him. I don't think he was citing his MF success based on 5 runs. I have no clue what college statistics you took alfjar but I'm glad I didn't go there. In your world I should just run around with 0% MF. Then we have jimjohnson attacking Mirbz's ambiguity when talking about a "program". Just searching for something else to argue about because the other argument doesn't make any sense eh?
 
Unlike in the thread Mirbz linked, I agree with him. I don't think he was citing his MF success based on 5 runs. I have no clue what college statistics you took alfjar but I'm glad I didn't go there. In your world I should just run around with 0% MF. Then we have jimjohnson attacking Mirbz's ambiguity when talking about a "program". Just searching for something else to argue about because the other argument doesn't make any sense eh?


Its good he linked that thread, he is closed minded he is. As for the me attacking him, if you notice he was attacking someone else. I simply pointed out his logic was flawed.

Also no one said 0% in MF was the way to go in this thread.
 
Back
Top