theatristformallyknownasG
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 3,041
- Reaction score
- 8
Yes, agree with znuffle, a lot of .cc programmers seem to have "real life issues" (can't do much about earthquakes though) and disappear for months at a time, or are simply unstable human beings to start with, I can remember on huge dummy spit that was extremely childish by one developer. This is the hardest part when a programmers goes AWOL the end users who have loved their work suddenly are faced with problems when HB suddenly decides to change the rules and the .cc no longer works. There is no real alternative currently provided by HB in singular, (yes I use it now and then but it is simply horrible for some classes) so the end user of HB has no way to operate their bot, they get very frustrated and jump on the boards to vent their anger.
A lot of programmers I work with have the same problem as some of the .cc developers too, it's my way or the highway, no-one else could possibly know a better way to program than me, so how can my code be improved upon, arrogance at it's best. Everyone has their own idea on how to accomplish a task and has to take onboard someone else may have a better twist on an idea than them, not just rule it out completely.
What to do though, thats the hard part. I can't see HB only supporting one .cc that is contributed too by many people, too many egos spoil the .cc. Individual .cc's developed by programmers that go awol isn;'t helpful either. Will be interested as to the outcome of all this.
G
A lot of programmers I work with have the same problem as some of the .cc developers too, it's my way or the highway, no-one else could possibly know a better way to program than me, so how can my code be improved upon, arrogance at it's best. Everyone has their own idea on how to accomplish a task and has to take onboard someone else may have a better twist on an idea than them, not just rule it out completely.
What to do though, thats the hard part. I can't see HB only supporting one .cc that is contributed too by many people, too many egos spoil the .cc. Individual .cc's developed by programmers that go awol isn;'t helpful either. Will be interested as to the outcome of all this.
G