What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
RebornBuddy Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which SSD to get?

I wouldn't even bother tbh I have an ssd and haven't notices much of a difference!
 
He probably forgot to activate AHCI in bios of his machine before he installed Windows. If you forget this you get about 1 / 4 of the effect a SSD gives (to activate this after windows is installed you need to google this process). having a SSD is probably the cheapest way to boost performance of any pc without spending the big bucks.

Ontopic: you might want to look on disks that use the New SandForce controller, which brand does not make much matter as these are nearly as fast all of them.
 
Last edited:
Yea.. thats why I want to get one >.< I just can't decide to be honest, their so close to each other spec so I wanted to get some feedback from other people. even with the AHCI disabled, an SSD is still WAAAY faster then an 5400RPM HDD.
 
Id look for review and just go for the one that has highest amount of IOPS. The sales pitch "max iops 85k" is a gimmick, id go look for real world data.

Or id just go for the one which is cheapest of the two, they are both good disks on paper. And i know the OCZ one have had great reviews.

On a second hand when looking thru tech articles i would for sure go for the OCZ disk. They are giving it superb reviews over and over, across the whole line.
 
Last edited:
Yea, I have been reading up on the OCZ and I haven't herd of an OCZ failing yet at least. how ever all of them have 80.000+ Iops, and just about the same read/write speed, and I haven't found any "dirt" on the Mach or the Crosair :o
 
Hitsuchan said:
Yea.. thats why I want to get one >.< I just can't decide to be honest, their so close to each other spec so I wanted to get some feedback from other people. even with the AHCI disabled, an SSD is still WAAAY faster then an 5400RPM HDD.
Click to expand...

Ye they are, I got a ForceGT 120gb, way faster then my WD Black, and 120gb is enough for Visual Studio, wow and battlefield 3.
hddbench.webp
 
Jvidia said:
I wouldn't even bother tbh I have an ssd and haven't notices much of a difference!
Click to expand...

You have it setup correctly? Because there is a major difference. Boot times drop significantly, load times for applications are faster. If you don't have it setup properly, then the performance can degrade.
 
I heard you get more out of OCZ and Intel has been having problems, I myself have 60gb which is enough for 3 games (plus operating system)... so you'll want at least 120gb.

Takes about 3-5 seconds to shutdown.
 
j0achim said:
He probably forgot to activate AHCI in bios of his machine before he installed Windows. If you forget this you get about 1 / 4 of the effect a SSD gives (to activate this after windows is installed you need to google this process). having a SSD is probably the cheapest way to boost performance of any pc without spending the big bucks.

Ontopic: you might want to look on disks that use the New SandForce controller, which brand does not make much matter as these are nearly as fast all of them.
Click to expand...

False I have achi enabled before I also have the 64bit option changed in the bios'
 
Tbh though I did get on of the first gens so maybe they have improved :/
 
If you plan to Boot from your ssd dont buy a vertex 3. They are incopatible to alot of s?t controllers, which causes alot of bluescreens.... ;-)
 
handnavi said:
If you plan to Boot from your ssd dont buy a vertex 3. They are incopatible to alot of s?t controllers, which causes alot of bluescreens.... ;-)
Click to expand...

I've also heard this, which is why I bought Vertex 2 but the read and write speeds are a lot less compared to v3... still cheaper and more stable though.
 
Giwin said:
I've also heard this, which is why I bought Vertex 2 but the read and write speeds are a lot less compared to v3... still cheaper and more stable though.
Click to expand...
I have this ssd... It sucks alot..
 
Well I have also heart that the Vertex 3 isn't the best for the OS, but that was the last firmware, the newest one shouldn't have any problem, at least thats what 99% of all forum users said, that after they updated their firmware it worked like a charm :D
the Crosair one should be working fine with an OS on it... and the Mach I haven't found any complains about it either..
 
Jvidia said:
Tbh though I did get on of the first gens so maybe they have improved :/
Click to expand...
If you compared 5400rpm HDD with SSD, you would see a difference even with first gen SSD.

And he is trying to buy SATA3 SSD(About 500+mb/s read/write) which is twice as fast as SATA2 SSD(about 200mb/s read/write).

"The read/write of modern hard drives are in the 50-150MB/s range." <- I got this from googling.
 
I would recommend a Crucial M4 drive. They're reliable, fast and relatively inexpensive. New firmware coming out soon will correct any issues with the drives. I replaced a 7,200 RPM drive with an M4 and boot times went from ~30 seconds to less than 5 seconds.
 
Before any recommendation may i ask you your mainboard model please?
Some mainboards dont support up to 500MB Read/write speeds and if your mobo is one of them SSD upgrade wont mean much. Also you can just buy a cheaper and slower one according to that.
 
Hitsuchan said:
Well I have also heart that the Vertex 3 isn't the best for the OS, but that was the last firmware, the newest one shouldn't have any problem, at least thats what 99% of all forum users said, that after they updated their firmware it worked like a charm :D
the Crosair one should be working fine with an OS on it... and the Mach I haven't found any complains about it either..
Click to expand...
Thats not true. ;-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top