Unbanned.

[billy96998]

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2015C00089

Australian law's definition of personal information:



If you request information about your ban, it's not considered personal information because it's not about you. They can tell you stuff like your IP address or your name, but your processes don't count.

That was fast, do you know the address? The American one can do as well

 

[eigoteacher]

That was fast, do you know the address? The American one can do as well

There's no real need to send a letter to them, but I don't know any addresses. Sorry.

There is no single US law about privacy. However, the current accepted definition of personal data is pretty much the same.

http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-122/sp800-122.pdf

A guidebook from the government.

An organization cannot properly protect PII it does not know about. This document uses a broad
definition of PII to identify as many potential sources of PII as possible (e.g., databases, shared network
drives, backup tapes, contractor sites). PII is ―any information about an individual maintained by an
agency, including (1) any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual‘s identity,
such as name, social security number, date and place of birth, mother‘s maiden name, or biometric
records; and (2) any other information that is linked or linkable to an individual, such as medical,
educational, financial, and employment information.‖ 6
Examples of PII include, but are not limited to:
 Name, such as full name, maiden name, mother‘s maiden name, or alias
 Personal identification number, such as social security number (SSN), passport number, driver‘s
license number, taxpayer identification number, or financial account or credit card number
 Address information, such as street address or email address
 Personal characteristics, including photographic image (especially of face or other identifying
characteristic), fingerprints, handwriting, or other biometric data (e.g., retina scan, voice signature,
facial geometry)
Information about an individual that is linked or linkable to one of the above (e.g., date of birth, place
of birth, race, religion, weight, activities, geographical indicators, employment information, medical
information, education information, financial information).

Ban information is not covered.

 

[Elyzol]

Yes and also...does it have to be in French? I doubt it right? Not everyone can speak fluently French. That would be silly.

at least 50% of the worlds population should or should have spoken french or some dialect of it at one point of their lifes. trust me, it's awesome! this comes
from a german and we hate french by default (same goes the other way around as i have personally encountered several times and have jet to be proven otherwise).
other than that:
made my day

Maybe if you played on a realm that people cared about then it would matter No one cares about the EU realms.

That wont ever happen cause the player base of EU servers consists of 50 people. Blizzard doesnt care about EU servers just US servers

while your statement is correct for blizzard itself - provable through the handling of eu forums in general and bug reports (once i posted one and it got straight moved to profession forum) -
the other statements are quite wrong.

some numbers and explanation how i concluded my viewing:

US: 24,140,265
EU: 22,622,140 (-6,3%)
source: realmpop

now that we have covered the numbers part lets head over to the "skill" part:

1 Method (r) EU-Twisting Nether
2 Paragon EU-Lightning's Blade
3 Midwinter (r) US-Sargeras
4 佶天鸿 CN-Thousand Needles
5 清水星辰 CN-Maelstrom
6 Экзорсус EU (RU)-Ревущий фьорд
7 Envy (r) EU-Kazzak
8 龙之心 CN-Frostmane
9 Ascendance (r) EU-Draenor
10 Rapid Eye Movement EU-Tarren Mill
source: wowprogress

this goes on until at 39 the SECOND US-realm based guild got this laughable piece of content clear.


what i am getting at is that:

• this stuff people come up with while insulting one another or else doesn't help.
• impatience doesn't get anyone anywhere except your grill hating on you. please hold off with "when will hb be up again"
  and "aaahhhh i need to play/bot there is some news let's hop straight on it!"
• discussion is good, but on this legal stuff: did anyone of you guys ever thought of actually asking a lawyer?
  or did i do sth. wrong when i decided to stop school (boring and easy) to go and do what i want instead of enlisting to law school?

 

[eigoteacher]

Congrats Smartie, and The Gos there is no need for him to provide proof, even if he did the sheep wouldnt believe and would flame anyway. if your curious do it yourself lazy.

Hahahahahaha.

So you want everyone to believe him without proof?

When everyone is trying to take legal action against Blizzard for not providing proof regarding the ban?

He doesn't have to prove himself, but Blizzard does? Hahahaha.

 

[ITGuy]

Hahahahahaha.

So you want everyone to believe him without proof?

When everyone is trying to take legal action against Blizzard for not providing proof regarding the ban?

He doesn't have to prove himself, but Blizzard does? Hahahaha.

i think i said it perfect "even if he did the sheep woudnt believe him." i think we know where you stand

 

[eigoteacher]

i think i said it perfect "even if he did the sheep woudnt believe him." i think we know where you stand

2.
a. A person regarded as timid, weak, or submissive.
b. One who is easily swayed or led.

Uh, you're only describing those who believe this with no proof...

Considering I'm not easily swayed by anything unless evidence is provided and people who believe it don't look for more evidence, by definition they are more easily swayed than I am and therefore sheep, not me.

 

[killajosh]

^ ^ 1000%