Hello all,
I am currently trying to help out some people regarding how to approach Blizzard. Since Blizzard at this point hasn't revealed any information on how they identified HB and what method they used, it's clear that one need to be careful about how to approach them. This is of course completely intentional, as there would always be possible to find more or less legit explanations if you know their methods.
Please don't derail the thread with anything but what I'm asking (opinions on legal issues, and whatnot, just because you just have to).
What we know, is that some people got busted on some accounts and not others, on the same PC. That pretty much rules out that it's a disk scan only issue, unless wow/HB was run from different users with different disk access rights (unless of course, Blizzard detected so many accounts they just randomly picked a subset to lessen the impact). I am curious about a few things, though:
What is clear is that Blizzard refuse to provide proof for their reason behind termination of their account. This is pretty dodgy according to several trade/merchant laws (if you disagree about that fact, you are free to do so, but leave it out of this thread), so it's obvious that they are willing to take risks by withholding this information. This makes me suspect that they have detected HB in a way that can't be unmistakenly linked to activities on a specific account, or in fact they detected HB by means that could be easily circumvented (i.e. external detection/scanning and not in-game detection of data sent to the game client itself). Nevertheless, I suspect that they now are buying time and are taking the risk and will re-enable the accounts if the method indeed is illegal or in such a way it can't be linked to an account with 100% certainity to avoid the shit storm.
Why am I asking? Because I'm helping someone out who got banned, without actually botting his account. However, HB was running on the PC but not attached to the game, but at this point we're unsure if it could have been attached by mistake at some brief moment (no actions, just running Enyo, although it still means it could have cast some spells like missing buffs and so on) before it was shut down. He did definitely not run any actions or movements, that would be considered "running a bot". We need to figure out a bit more, in order for him to be able to appeal this in a way they can't refute based upon evidence.
Please no speculations and noise. If you're not absolutely sure about one of the things I'm asking, it is better to not answer it. I know there is a fair chance that someone will deliberately plant false information in this thread, but I hope some reputable people can provide some insight.
I am currently trying to help out some people regarding how to approach Blizzard. Since Blizzard at this point hasn't revealed any information on how they identified HB and what method they used, it's clear that one need to be careful about how to approach them. This is of course completely intentional, as there would always be possible to find more or less legit explanations if you know their methods.
Please don't derail the thread with anything but what I'm asking (opinions on legal issues, and whatnot, just because you just have to).
What we know, is that some people got busted on some accounts and not others, on the same PC. That pretty much rules out that it's a disk scan only issue, unless wow/HB was run from different users with different disk access rights (unless of course, Blizzard detected so many accounts they just randomly picked a subset to lessen the impact). I am curious about a few things, though:
- Was the HB program active on your PC whilst logged into an account that wasn't banned during the suspected detection period, but never executed any bot/script on the unbanned account?
- Did you run HB with a renamed bot directory and executable, or even altered the executable so that it would return a different checksum/hash if scanned?
- Did anyone run WoW in user mode, and HB as Administrator, so that WoW wouldn't have access to read process/task lists not ran on the User account?
- Did you run the launcher, or just WoW?
- Did you run HBRelog or similar program?
- Did you ever run HB on one char and relogged to another without stopping HB, such that it attempted to cast spells/attacks and such that belongs to another class? (this would be literally impossible to do on accident, unless you deliberately made macros to spam mass amounts of bad spells on the wrong class via LUA calls).
- Did anyone run HB as Administrator and WoW as another User and restrict access to the HB containing dir/disk to the Admin user so WoW couldn't read its content (file lists or the log files of HB)?
- Did you check if you were banned on the bnet account list on battle.net or in the Blizzard launcher, before you actually logged in to the game (was the detection related to logging in somehow?)
What is clear is that Blizzard refuse to provide proof for their reason behind termination of their account. This is pretty dodgy according to several trade/merchant laws (if you disagree about that fact, you are free to do so, but leave it out of this thread), so it's obvious that they are willing to take risks by withholding this information. This makes me suspect that they have detected HB in a way that can't be unmistakenly linked to activities on a specific account, or in fact they detected HB by means that could be easily circumvented (i.e. external detection/scanning and not in-game detection of data sent to the game client itself). Nevertheless, I suspect that they now are buying time and are taking the risk and will re-enable the accounts if the method indeed is illegal or in such a way it can't be linked to an account with 100% certainity to avoid the shit storm.
Why am I asking? Because I'm helping someone out who got banned, without actually botting his account. However, HB was running on the PC but not attached to the game, but at this point we're unsure if it could have been attached by mistake at some brief moment (no actions, just running Enyo, although it still means it could have cast some spells like missing buffs and so on) before it was shut down. He did definitely not run any actions or movements, that would be considered "running a bot". We need to figure out a bit more, in order for him to be able to appeal this in a way they can't refute based upon evidence.
Please no speculations and noise. If you're not absolutely sure about one of the things I'm asking, it is better to not answer it. I know there is a fair chance that someone will deliberately plant false information in this thread, but I hope some reputable people can provide some insight.
Last edited: