simple query

[Senpaii]

..and the info is probably here somewhere but I just didn't see it.
what is uk27 and should I be worried about it? also, being as the last 3 iterations of pokefarmer were detectable (at least for me on the most minimal of settings).. has that issue been addressed? (eg was the test account used to test the patch suspended)
cheers~
and as always, thanks for the hard work!!

 

[Senpaii]

heh I see the frustrating "we-know-better-than-you" system is still in place. updated bot, ran one account for two hours (about ten to noonish), stopped bot and went to thanksgiving dinner, came home 6 hours later and ran another account for ten minutes and "bot stops to protect from ban"
>_>

 

[CAcove]

Senpaii, we always suggest a separate folder for each account you run, as using multiple accounts on the same PF folder just adds to the warning timer.

As for uk27 we have not made an official statement about what it is, yet. Though I can say, it not being patched at this time, is no reason for concern based on the information I have at hand.

regarding the "detection" inquiry. You must consider, when we test, it is not public yet, but as soon as we announce its out, that means Niantic can find out, and work to stop accounts. We are always working to prevent this, but sometimes some accounts get caught in the crossfire, as with any bot. We will continue to work on making PF as safe as possible, and thank you for your questions, I do hope I was able to address them for you.

 

[Senpaii]

yeah I hear ya bud. normally the multi-folder method works best when running multiple accounts over extended periods, I was just surprised it happened with a full day of doing nothing. problem is .. I'd have something like 43 folders.
I appreciate the consolation re: uk27.. as such I shan't worry over it.
I sincerely hope that the current iteration of PF is as bulletproof as it used to be, or as PGB used to be.
Thanks as always m8

ftr this "Ignoring Pokemon because Rule does not match given CP/IV." bull cost me two 100iv Banettes. *rabble rabble rabble*
..not that banette is a particularly strong 'mon to use for my applications, but still. >.<

 

[CAcove]

yeah I hear ya bud. normally the multi-folder method works best when running multiple accounts over extended periods, I was just surprised it happened with a full day of doing nothing. problem is .. I'd have something like 43 folders.
I appreciate the consolation re: uk27.. as such I shan't worry over it.
I sincerely hope that the current iteration of PF is as bulletproof as it used to be, or as PGB used to be.
Thanks as always m8

ftr this "Ignoring Pokemon because Rule does not match given CP/IV." bull cost me two 100iv Banettes. *rabble rabble rabble*
..not that banette is a particularly strong 'mon to use for my applications, but still. >.<

I totally understand the frustration about the Banettes, it doesnt matter if they are 1 hit wonders or 1 shotted failures, you want to catch them, and that makes sense. As was mentioned in an announcement, we have identified some issues with gen3 implementation, but are working on it, my apologies for the delay in response.

 

[Senpaii]

I totally understand the frustration about the Banettes, it doesnt matter if they are 1 hit wonders or 1 shotted failures, you want to catch them, and that makes sense. As was mentioned in an announcement, we have identified some issues with gen3 implementation, but are working on it, my apologies for the delay in response.

no worries m8. I have faith it will all be operational soon enough. If it takes a bit longer.. well, better done right than rushed. ^_^