What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

Request: RAF Dungeons Boost

jsmith

New Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

Anyone would be interested to make such an add on?

The main character (booster) will clear the Dungeons and the RAFed chars will follow on a x distance.. That would be like awesome :P

Thank you!
 
I believe this is already possible with PartyBot ?
 
lvl 85 set to IB, RAFs set to partybot. The issues you may have is with the follow distance of the RAFs (I had the RAFs collect the loot which slows them down compaired to the lvl85) and the resetting of the instance. IB wasn't around when I did it, so I wrote profiles and reset the instance manually.

*Quote from a thread I made previously

"I used two accounts RAF'ed (one to be my main, and one to be abused for the RAF bonus), and a third account level 85 druid which I had been botting on before. Instance boosted the two Raf'ed accounts from one to sixty on seven toons using my own instance profiles. They involved having one profile for the lvl 85, which went around the instances and cleared most of the trash, and another profile for the RAF'ed account that followed at a safe distance to leach the xp, whilst collecting the loots. When I had seven level 60 toons, I granted the levels to the remaining three. This gave me 10 level 60's. At this point I ditched one of the Raf'ed accounts and focused on the main account"

http://www.thebuddyforum.com/success-stories/32601-10-level-85s-one-account.html

It is possible.... but atm, to make it fully automated will probably be a challange.
 
thephoenix25 got it :P Fully automated would be awesome xD
 
Phoenix can i get those profiles you made for that?

Sorry SoulWeaver, I don't have them any more. All they were was, a grind profile with hotspots for the lvl 85 and a quest profile with delay/wait timers in it to keep the low level toons from getting into trouble. Very easy to make. But I think IB would be a better alternative to what I did, if you want to try it.
 
Back
Top