Semi new to botting, so i am only applying normal purchasing rules to a gaming program.
**Is it normal for a anticipated bot program to include JUST the bot itself? -Specifically talking about DB profiles.
As it stands, there was really ONLY ONE feasible profile released by officials; Core Arreat. <- this was a fairly rough copy that couldn't compete with any other *unsafe* bot (profiles) that were current (so ive read).
I bought DB on the first day, understood the 'growing' phase, and kept with user modified profile posts (as they blew the official profile through the roof).. Im still with user modified profiles.... everyone is.
Now, the few reputable DB community users releasing profiles are VERY hard working, quick to update, and quite honestly, has to deal with BS on a daily basis! - i cant appreciate any more to them. This BS comes from DB consumers that are 'requiring' tweeks/updates/proficiency - especially when a new DB version is released.
Personally - without current, working, efficient profiles; imho - a bot is incomplete - as this is a necessary requirement for botting to accomplish its sole goal.
-Why is this completely falling on the community to support this (imho) bot void?
-Why isnt this 'Bot void' primarily regulated by DB, as they are the producers of the full bot program and understand how a just-released-update will effect pathing, stashing, etc?
Are Bot programs' profiles ALWAYS regulated and dependent on the public?
If so: does DB have plans to 'break the mold'?
Before 'TL: DR Be happy you have a program that is making you money' is said, and although the recent bans make a scare; im VERY happy with DB's communication and strive for safety. IF this is a normal occurrence with all top-end bots, ill have nothing to do but accept my ignorance. Right now, im surprised this is currently accepted without thought and with *circumstantial* often frustration - as this is a VITAL part of a bot program.
**Is it normal for a anticipated bot program to include JUST the bot itself? -Specifically talking about DB profiles.
As it stands, there was really ONLY ONE feasible profile released by officials; Core Arreat. <- this was a fairly rough copy that couldn't compete with any other *unsafe* bot (profiles) that were current (so ive read).
I bought DB on the first day, understood the 'growing' phase, and kept with user modified profile posts (as they blew the official profile through the roof).. Im still with user modified profiles.... everyone is.
Now, the few reputable DB community users releasing profiles are VERY hard working, quick to update, and quite honestly, has to deal with BS on a daily basis! - i cant appreciate any more to them. This BS comes from DB consumers that are 'requiring' tweeks/updates/proficiency - especially when a new DB version is released.
Personally - without current, working, efficient profiles; imho - a bot is incomplete - as this is a necessary requirement for botting to accomplish its sole goal.
-Why is this completely falling on the community to support this (imho) bot void?
-Why isnt this 'Bot void' primarily regulated by DB, as they are the producers of the full bot program and understand how a just-released-update will effect pathing, stashing, etc?
Are Bot programs' profiles ALWAYS regulated and dependent on the public?
If so: does DB have plans to 'break the mold'?
Before 'TL: DR Be happy you have a program that is making you money' is said, and although the recent bans make a scare; im VERY happy with DB's communication and strive for safety. IF this is a normal occurrence with all top-end bots, ill have nothing to do but accept my ignorance. Right now, im surprised this is currently accepted without thought and with *circumstantial* often frustration - as this is a VITAL part of a bot program.