I expect this to happen on the forums occasionally, because author's don't usually state their intentions, and people don't understand or choose not to respect Copyright law. (This is
not in anyway an indictment on Tubajedimr, or anyone else--mistakes and misunderstandings happen.)
First IANAL; however, I've frequently had to use copyrighted/licensed work in my profession. This following is my understanding of the law. (And, I know we're in an International forum, and 'the law' is not the same everywhere.)
Unless explicitly stated, the original author retains full copyrights to their work. You may not modify it or redistribute it without their permission. If they intend for you to build upon their work, the author should make their expectations clear. Making an author's expectations clear is
precisely what a 'license' provides--an author extends (or not) limited permissions to the user Community. The Wikipedia contains a
comparison of dozens and dozens of these things.
The license that was picked for the Buddy Wiki is the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0. It is a
very popular license that allows others to build on existing work, provided that they share it back to the community. However, in the forums, each author is the sole decider on how their work will be shared, and the licensing terms.
This is a
perfect example of an author making his expectations clear. Although, this belongs in the original post.
The statement is a little ambiguous in that it allows me to take and resell his profile without giving credit or financial contribution to the original author--I don't know if that was the
intent or not. This is why its good to stick with 'known' licensing.
Of course, I would never resell the profile, but the ambiguous statement certainly gives me the privilege, as it is written.
So, it boils down to this...
- An author retains copyright ownership for any work they produce--whether the copyright is explicitly stated or not.
- Publishing work in a forum implicitly gives you permission to use the work, but that's all.
- You are not free to build on their work, unless you have explicit permission from the author, or the licensing terms under which the work was released grants you this privilege
Even if the law is different in your part of the globe, you should really extend commensurate respect to an author for his contribution.
Personally, I'm
all for sharing, but we must respect the rights of others. One of my most favorite quotes is attributed to Sir Isaac Newton...
cheers,
chinajade