What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

[Plugin] AdvancedItemFilter RELOADED !

Status
Not open for further replies.
Infinite Monkeys said:
When I'm learning a new language or API, I learn by copying and changing things that work. I'm still at that stage with EB because the poor API documentation makes it hard to progress further and I don't have the time to dedicate to it. Again, I've never claimed anything else. I don't understand why you are constantly trying to insult me by calling me bad at EB coding when I am admitting that in pretty much every post I make. Obviously the snippet you made in 18 minutes won't work perfectly, but the point is that if you can make a barebones attempt in 18 minutes then it wasn't at all an unreasonable request. I'm referring to the two threads where I released things, both of which are full of people saying thanks.
Click to expand...
Ok so you just contradicted yourself.

1st - This requires no knowledge of AIF, what so ever, default plugins have all the information.

2nd - It does work, you have no clue what you are doing, you took my bait and bit it, twice. Therefore it won't take you a few hour, more like a few years with that attitude.

3rd, you said you have no knowledge, yet your second post said it would take you a few hours? Sooooo do you have knowledge or do you not? I'm confused.

and the icing on the cake.

You said arrogance was needed to post in a thread that belongs to someone else? Isn't it arrogance to ask of a feature inside someone's thread, when you said it would take you a few hours with AIF to get it working, yet AIF isn't required to get it working. Therefore aren't you being arogant in posting a request that have nothing to do with AIF(kinda)?
 
You're really reaching now haha, you sure are determined to... I don't even know, what's your endgame here
 
Well since all 3 of your 'points' rely on misreading my post, and you are just insulting me rather than actually putting forth an argument, yes. There's no reason to refute your points if you're just going to misconstrue (whether intentionally or otherwise) what I'm saying and use that to keep insulting me. Nothing you're saying has any purpose, you're not trying to convince me of anything or get me to do anything, you're just being an asshole, so why bother explaining how you are wrong?
 
Guys, please keep this topic about AIF. I feel like you could have had this discussion in private messages.

As for making development requests, it would be nice for the requester to start investigating the issue on his own before posting on the forum. Sharing ideas for future developments is great, but can be irritating to those who receive many. Show that you care about the issue at hand by starting to code on your own and post what you could come up with, even if it is incomplete. This will encourage others to help you or continue your work. As Infinite Monkeys stated, the bot's API is not well documented. Any conversation on the forums centred around a piece of code would help any developer understand the API better.

It's a shame that the community does not use Github for hosting source code. Being able to make Pull Requests on other's plugin and getting code reviews would go a long way in improving the plugins and the community's understanding of the API.
 
Infinite Monkeys said:
Well since all 3 of your 'points' rely on misreading my post, and you are just insulting me rather than actually putting forth an argument, yes. There's no reason to refute your points if you're just going to misconstrue (whether intentionally or otherwise) what I'm saying and use that to keep insulting me. Nothing you're saying has any purpose, you're not trying to convince me of anything or get me to do anything, you're just being an asshole, so why bother explaining how you are wrong?
Click to expand...
rofl..
Ok dude, which points are wrong? I read your posts and disassembled them piece by piece, hence the points. If you don't elaborate, we'll take it as valid.

Can you stop waking around the bush? the hole you dig keeps getting deeper.

@buddyfu2, I don't private message, there's nothing good on there, it'y only begging.

Monkey won't start any code because he knows none, he keeps blaming API not being documented. It doesn't need to be, like the bulk of us use it, and use it well. I don't see how a documented api will help those that aren't willing to put the time or effort in. We all know who that is.

I use Assembla for my SVN, same thing as github but I like it better.
 
Alright guys, this thread is for AIF discussions so take any other back and forth to PMs please.
 
Infinite Monkeys said:
Would it be possible to drop items instead of vendoring them? It'd be nice if the bot would pick up rares until it was full, ID them while still in the map and drop the trash ones rather than going back to the hideout just to vendor them. It's more playerlike too.
Click to expand...

Great suggestion. It would greatly increase the perfomance especially for 200+ IIR characters. Dunno should it be part of AIF or separate plugin.
 
Can i ask an Question?
i copy new plugin advanceditemfilter in to the folder plugins but when i start buddy there log note error ?can any1 help me pls, im a newbie thanks ^^!
 
hello newbie. Post the log with error you are saying about. We are not wizards to know what's happening to you.
 
You've placed new version over the old one. You need to delete the old folder first and then place the newest version of AIF inside Plugins folder.
 
Hello AIF crew (or someone who might be able to help me)
Heres the deal, im trying to make it pick up items with an Ilvl over 80.

Lets do an example with rings. Lets say i want the bot to pick up rings with ilvl 80+ would it be something like "item.IsNormal and item.IsRing and item.IsItemLevel 80" Ive tried this it dosent validate. Im sure im doing something wrong and would apreciate any help.
 
muuhu said:
Hello AIF crew (or someone who might be able to help me)
Heres the deal, im trying to make it pick up items with an Ilvl over 80.

Lets do an example with rings. Lets say i want the bot to pick up rings with ilvl 80+ would it be something like "item.IsNormal and item.IsRing and item.IsItemLevel 80" Ive tried this it dosent validate. Im sure im doing something wrong and would apreciate any help.
Click to expand...
I don't know if tonyx added a item.ILvl or somewhat into AIF, he will have to clarify.
 
toNyx said:
Code: 
public int ItemLevel { get { return _myItem.ItemLevel; } }
Click to expand...
Im sorry toNyx, i might be incredibly stupid, or just not so bright with code, but is this what i would insert directly into my rules? :)
 
muuhu said:
Im sorry toNyx, i might be incredibly stupid, or just not so bright with code, but is this what i would insert directly into my rules? :)
Click to expand...
that's the member that I was looking for since I run a different AIF now.

item.ItemLevel >= 80 should work
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top