IS BOXER vs. VMware

[geostigma]

Which do you think is better?

Which uses more RAM/CPU usage

I currently have an IS Boxer license

I am trying to get VM's to work but it is a royal PAIN, and these forums are not as active/supportive as I had expected. Can't seem to find a helpful Tech to iron out issues i come across with VM'ing


thanks

geo

 

[CodenameG]

Which do you think is better?

Which uses more RAM/CPU usage

I currently have an IS Boxer license

I am trying to get VM's to work but it is a royal PAIN, and these forums are not as active/supportive as I had expected. Can't seem to find a helpful Tech to iron out issues i come across with VM'ing


thanks

geo

VMware is hard because your running a lot more then you need, isxboxer just runs what it needs to. so if you dont have a bad gaming machine then go with isx.

 

[bambam922]

Well back when I botted D3, I used ISBoxer on 4 accounts.
I was around 70% CPU usage on an i5 760 OCed to 3.8 GHz and about 45% of 16gigs of memory used.

I agree that VMs are a pain and thats why I never used them.

However, staff only directly supports our products and not 3rd party.
There should be some guides on how to used VMs and ISBoxer in the guides section.

 

[SKing]

As this is an isboxer vs vmware thread, I have a question I can't seem to find answered anywhere. Can isboxer simulate a different computer for each of the game instances? Because that is the most useful thing vmware does... every vm registers as an individual computer to blizz. Not to mention the ability to set up V*P*N via 3rd party software on vmware.