Here are some variances of zwiz and the routineIt's so easy to gear, way easier than lon WD and you won't regret it. I swap from 2 rath dps zbarb z necro/zdoc to this composition.
View attachment 228315 View attachment 228316
Tonight I did fresh install from the latest stable Demonbuddy 1.1.3201.500.zip . I deleted Trinity plugin and replaced it by the latest SVN from https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/unifiedtrinity.Master/ . I installed zAutoFollow 1.260.1 from https://www.thebuddyforum.com/threads/plugin-autofollow-1-260-1.235899/.
Then I have overwritten the Plugins directory in each of the 3 DB installations by content of Plugins_1.3.zip in the OP. Ran GRs for 2 hours and I haven't seen Rathmas to stop for a second:
will check this this afternoon after work. thxI seem to be failing to determine what is the reason for the "no fighting" problem some of the 3-man guys are seeing. Tonight I did fresh install from the latest stable Demonbuddy 1.1.3201.500.zip . I deleted Trinity plugin and replaced it by the latest SVN from https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/unifiedtrinity.Master/ . I installed zAutoFollow 1.260.1 from https://www.thebuddyforum.com/threads/plugin-autofollow-1-260-1.235899/.
Then I have overwritten the Plugins directory in each of the 3 DB installations by content of Plugins_1.3.zip in the OP. Ran GRs for 2 hours and I haven't seen Rathmas to stop for a second:
![]()
![]()
The quick build I put together just for the testing:
1. zmonk, OP build + Inner Sanc with Temple of Protection (to compensate IP), Mantra of Healing with Boon of Inspiration (needed some healing)
2. Rathma 1, OP build + Devour->Decrepify with Borrowed Time and Passive Life from Death -> Blood is Power
3. Rathma 2, OP build + Bone Spikes -> Blood Siphon with Blood Sucker
EDIT: Latest Trinity SVN seems to have some weird issues with combat activation. I needed ClusterSize = 25 to have it behaving similarly as few weeks ago with ClusterSize = 10. Inconsistently as well, sometimes the group was fighting 2 mobs packs.
PS: So this was a failure attempt to reconstruct what you are seeing. Posting the results to make sure your did all the steps described above.
Some relevant Rathma settings below.
the old 1.3 might be the 1.2 in OP, but i might guessing wrong, better wait Tempest confirmation.Just wanted to inform that I cannot see Plugins_1.3 in the OP. 1 & 2 are there, just not 3. You might want to check why is that happening.
Ops, I messed up. Fixed. (Been updating 1.3 for @ZDL 's accept-rift-from-other-acts fix. and forgot too reup)Just wanted to inform that I cannot see Plugins_1.3 in the OP. 1 & 2 are there, just not 3. You might want to check why is that happening.
@Tempest i've done everything like you did, i'll make my team run GR95 for few hours, for now 3 rifts done with half time left but no dangerous trash/elite like Witches, Winged Assassin, Demonic Forge or backtracking. Will post EXPCount stats in few hours.
herehI, Can u link your ExpCount plugin pls.
Thanks FEdez
weird, i did nothing except putting it in DB/Plugins and then enable it in plugin tab when botting. Works solo and group for meDop not work for me...
Where are you taking those damage numbers from the Zdps wiz? Remember that most of the damage enhancements from the Wiz are additive. (Bone chill, slow time's, cold blooded...all additive).
I don't think a calculation of (approx.) 70% multiplicative is accurate at all- far from it, actually.
And to take full advantage of the wizard, a fire skill is also neccesary for Conflagrate passive.
http://teambrg.com/diablo-3/d3-zdps-support-wizard-builds-faq/
This is the best guide I've seen from the Zdps wiz. I've used them in the past, and actually trinity supported it well with the included routines.
Having used Dh, wiz, and crusader Zdps before, DH is clearly the strongest one (damage wise)for speedfarms due to multiplicative Howl and the best iceblink proccer with Multishot.
Wizard is strong especially due to Event Horizon; Negating most dangerous affixes opens up glass cannon possibilities for the DD. but that makes it viable for double DD compositions; triple support normally has no need of added toughness.
EDIT: Also having the same SVN issues ; seems to be not correctly considering cluster size. Probably better to revert.