What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
RebornBuddy Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFXIV and Honorbuddy

I hope they do make a Buddy Bot for FFXIV:ARR eventually I would definitely support it
 
I hope they are still continuing to look into this game... I am still using MMOVIPER and as garabage as people may say it is, its getting better by the day , but like I mentioned before I know it will be nowhere near what honorbuddy would be able to do and the community on honorbuddy would make it a million times better
 
Giwin said:
the game is not near stable, just needs more time because of the server issues it's hard to see how many people are playing to evaluate if it's worth making a bot for.

The initial PC release of Final Fantasy XIV received negative reviews. Complaints ranged from its essentially broken structure to its numerous bugs and glitches, leading to a consensus that the game was unfinished, if not totally unplayable. It holds a score of 49.33% on GameRankings[SUP][43][/SUP] and 49/100 on Metacritic,[SUP][7][/SUP] making it the lowest-scoring game of the series. Kevin VanOrd of GameSpot gave the game a 4.0/10. He called the game a "step backward for the genre", citing a bad interface, quest restrictions, awful player and NPC economy, and numerous other problems upon release.[SUP][11][/SUP] IGN gave a 5.5/10 (mediocre).[SUP][48][/SUP] 1UP.com gave the game a D+,[SUP][44][/SUP] saying that inside Final Fantasy XIV "there is a game with considerable depth and potential here, but it needs another six to nine months before it's ready for primetime," further stating that "it's impossible to recommend to anyone in its current state". PC Gamer gave it a 30% rating, reviewer Tom Senior writing that "the kindest thing that can be said about the Final Fantasy MMO is that it has a good intro movie". GameTrailers gave it 4.2/10, saying it "falls flat at every turn" and "isn't worth the hassle", and explaining that the launch for it was unacceptable because it was a "broken incomplete mess".[SUP][47][/SUP] In December 2010, the website labeled it "The Most Disappointing Game of the Year" in their "Game of the Year Awards"[SUP][50][/SUP] and also included the game in a "Top Ten Worst Sequels" feature.[SUP][51][/SUP]
Cheat Code Central was more favorable, giving the game a positive 4.2/5 rating, but also initially noting they "can't recommend that you spend $50, and then $12.99 a month after the first 30 days, on a title that has as many flaws as FFXIV does."[SUP][7][/SUP]This sentence was later removed from the review.[SUP][52][/SUP]
Click to expand...

O.O

has over a million subs last I checked. think 1.5... most of the games HB has bots for are smaller and/or ive never even heard of. Don't think that's the determining factor. As for stability, not sure what is considered stable/unstable but the game has never crashed for me? o.O
 
klepp0906 said:
O.O

has over a million subs last I checked. think 1.5... most of the games HB has bots for are smaller and/or ive never even heard of. Don't think that's the determining factor. As for stability, not sure what is considered stable/unstable but the game has never crashed for me? o.O
Click to expand...

Hes stupid and didn't notice the dates. All that stuff is about FF14 not FF14ARR.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top