Is it possible to make this a class action lawsuit for intransparent, surprising and incomprehensible TOS and EULA and then force blizzard to refund your prepaid game time, server transfers, game sale etc if they don't unban?
Im currently attempting to file in small claims for about 500$ in prepaid game time on 8 accounts, still waiting to consult with my lawyer in orange county.
here is some interesting info ive found so far..
An EULA is not a contract -- if the software is sold on physical media, it is a SALE, not a LICENSE. Software vendors can write up whatever the hell of an EULA they want, they're just pretending to be in a positition of authority.Bottom line -- EULAs are not contracts. They don't require signatures. Unless a software vendor can prove that a consumer actually read and understood the EULA (which is almost always bound with a SIGNATURE, not a button press on "I agree"), EULAs are worthless as a legal matter. This is why in the court case Softman v. Adobe, he sided with the consumer, whereas if the consumer actually did engage in a real contract, the judge would have sided with the software vendor.
Link about the "first sale doctrine" https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/it-s-still-duck-court-re-affirms-first-sale-doctri
Source: http://www.amazon.com/Blizzard-refund-reject-their-terms/forum/Fx2RW8IRFN8JW6J/Tx35E0DQ8WVYU6J/1?_encoding=UTF8&asin=B000ZKA0J6
Im currently attempting to file in small claims for about 500$ in prepaid game time on 8 accounts, still waiting to consult with my lawyer in orange county.
here is some interesting info ive found so far..
An EULA is not a contract -- if the software is sold on physical media, it is a SALE, not a LICENSE. Software vendors can write up whatever the hell of an EULA they want, they're just pretending to be in a positition of authority.Bottom line -- EULAs are not contracts. They don't require signatures. Unless a software vendor can prove that a consumer actually read and understood the EULA (which is almost always bound with a SIGNATURE, not a button press on "I agree"), EULAs are worthless as a legal matter. This is why in the court case Softman v. Adobe, he sided with the consumer, whereas if the consumer actually did engage in a real contract, the judge would have sided with the software vendor.
Link about the "first sale doctrine" https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/it-s-still-duck-court-re-affirms-first-sale-doctri
Source: http://www.amazon.com/Blizzard-refund-reject-their-terms/forum/Fx2RW8IRFN8JW6J/Tx35E0DQ8WVYU6J/1?_encoding=UTF8&asin=B000ZKA0J6