Blacklisting

[Reviir]

This may seem like a dumb question but its perplexing.

Some blacklists I have seen from people in the know are set up with only 1 name like so.

<bad_location><name>Lichbloom</name><waypoint>6666.66 1065.173 279.3912</waypoint><comment>Manual: Mobs </comment></bad_location>

Other badnode lists are set up with each possible name of the node. Like this.

<bad_location><name>Lichbloom</name><waypoint>6666.66 1065.173 279.3912</waypoint><comment>Manual: Mobs </comment></bad_location>
<bad_location><name>Icethorn</name><waypoint>6666.66 1065.173 279.3912</waypoint><comment>Manual: Mobs </comment></bad_location>

Now I have my current bad node list set up the second way atm. I have 42 bad nodes. BUT when I start GB it only says 21 nodes blacklisted... That being said... To a lamen like me it looks like the <name>xxxx</name> tag has 0 actual use other than a reference. Looks like GB accualy ignores that tag and only cares about <waypoint>xxxxx</waypoint>

Can I possibly get some official word on this. I know its not a big difference just wanting it so i can keep this list nice and clean and organized

 

[Tony]

post here your debug log
if there is a problem with your badnodes,your debug will show it to us

 

[Reviir]

No issues at all actualy just trying to see if having the second example is necessary or is it just overkill and not needed.

 

[Tony]

Gb is reading the cordinates
name is optional

 

[Reviir]

Bingo that is what i wanted to know.