What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit API Documentation
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic

Avoid bann

C

chocho

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

If anyone know if change charachters example : first 12h - 1 wizzard then other 12h then 3d etc we can avoid bann ? :)
 
Definitely. I switch characters every 37 minutes. A guy I know, used to know a guy, who used to work for Blizzard, who ate lunch with an admin from Diablo 1. He said, that he said, that he said, if you change characters every 37 minutes, exactly, it's a script they have, and they'll never even know.
 
If you also dye your character into a different color, they won't recognize you.
 
There has not been a single ban since ROS went live
 
Well, what is the point of banning now since there's no economy at all? :P
 
Nazair said:
Well, what is the point of banning now since there's no economy at all? :P
Click to expand...

The point of banning is that blizz knows that botters will buy new accounts again. What's not to like about more revenue?
 
Alkajak said:
The point of banning is that blizz knows that botters will buy new accounts again. What's not to like about more revenue?
Click to expand...

Most will not play anymore, and that means a LOT less headcount for their board of directors to get all juicy-eyed at. More than half the current population bots, and that means instead of 250,000 concurrent logins that means it's well below 150k which is not a "success" in blizzards eyes despite the AH being taken offline.


The whole point of making Gold and anything worth a fuck in ROS being BOA now is to A: Combat bots without banning, and B: Because they're stupid fucks.

I wouldn't be botting if everything was like in Diablo 2, you know...the last GOOD version of the Diablo series, wasn't fucking BOA.
 
Alkajak said:
The point of banning is that blizz knows that botters will buy new accounts again. What's not to like about more revenue?
Click to expand...
no point in buying a new account when there is no money to be made.
 
Dont make up dumbshit half-wit guess work snake oil solutions to not getting banned. Get the fuck out of here with that

Its simple. Dont bot like an idiot. Accept the risks.

If you cant do those things then fuck off.

Alkajak said:
The point of banning is that blizz knows that botters will buy new accounts again. What's not to like about more revenue?
Click to expand...


Don't be retarded. The point of banning is to keep players happy. Its a PR thing. Normal players dont like to see botters. Blizzard puts on a front of effort to get rid of the issue. Players are pacified. To suggest its to extend revenue by any sort of significant way is laughable.
 
Last edited:
when I start to see a huge increase in posts and complaints about botters on the forums/reddit. That's the time to lay low. Not until people complain about botting like they did about SoH will anything happen.
 
DroidFanBoyJP said:
Definitely. I switch characters every 37 minutes. A guy I know, used to know a guy, who used to work for Blizzard, who ate lunch with an admin from Diablo 1. He said, that he said, that he said, if you change characters every 37 minutes, exactly, it's a script they have, and they'll never even know.
Click to expand...


Hahahahahahhahahahahha
 
Mojoguy01 said:
Most will not play anymore, and that means a LOT less headcount for their board of directors to get all juicy-eyed at. More than half the current population bots, and that means instead of 250,000 concurrent logins that means it's well below 150k which is not a "success" in blizzards eyes despite the AH being taken offline.


The whole point of making Gold and anything worth a fuck in ROS being BOA now is to A: Combat bots without banning, and B: Because they're stupid fucks.



I wouldn't be botting if everything was like in Diablo 2, you know...the last GOOD version of the Diablo series, wasn't fucking BOA.
Click to expand...

I think you are on the right track. If blizzard banned all the botters (40-50%) of the players then it would show that they have half the actual gamers they show. Then would it be worth it for them to maintain the game with so little players i think not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top