Agility

[Deathdisguise]

thats all we have to do..impale with punish+aw+ck

Every time a "return ________" line is called, it starts back at the top though, which is why I found it amusing. You treated it like a rotation I suspect, haha

 

[xergz]

Every time a "return ________" line is called, it starts back at the top though, which is why I found it amusing. You treated it like a rotation I suspect, haha

/facepalm. I r a tard. I'm out of town till Monday. Will fix then. Our you can help me death and fix it for me[emoji4]

 

[Deathdisguise]

/facepalm. I r a tard. I'm out of town till Monday. Will fix then. Our you can help me death and fix it for me[emoji4]

Yeap! The code people submit doesn't have to be perfect, it's enough to give me a general idea of what needs to happen.

 

[xergz]

Yeap! The code people submit doesn't have to be perfect, it's enough to give me a general idea of what needs to happen.

Oh that's easy.
Impale to 35 sp,analyse+punish,impale to 30 sp ,analyse+punish.CK on cooldown.shred when nothing else is up
I put stealth+ preparation on #2 cause that is supposed to be hit when you have 3 seconds+ on punish & CK.
Thinking of sticking movement+ Cc breaks on #4.

 

[xergz]

Yeap! The code people submit doesn't have to be perfect, it's enough to give me a general idea of what needs to happen.

Any updates death?starting on my engi now. Have no clue how to handle channel casts

 

[Deathdisguise]

Any updates death?starting on my engi now. Have no clue how to handle channel casts

Sorry! I've been putting time into the quest profiles!

An update: Been working on channeling as well (just started), engineer bots (now working), and stance changes (kind of working, needs prettying up)

Also, the AbilityManager branch hasn't had any major issues, so it'll likely be merged into the trunk in the next update as well!

What this means: Stalker will be able to stance dance, Engineer will be able to get some serious routine work done to it finally, and Spellslinger will be the problem child (still, haha)

 

[themarketguy]

Looking for some feedback, trying to setup Warrior tanking build and having an issue with Power Link. I'm doing a check to determine if I have the buff, and if not and if KE is over 350, we're going to apply it... unfortunately it's being spammed on every global. It is an amp, am I handling amp buffs wrong - do they exist in some other space, I couldn't find one?

			if (SpellController.CanCast("Power Link") && Me.InnateResource >= 350 && !Me.HasBuff("Power Link"))
				return "Power Link";

Help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

 

[Deathdisguise]

Looking for some feedback, trying to setup Warrior tanking build and having an issue with Power Link. I'm doing a check to determine if I have the buff, and if not and if KE is over 350, we're going to apply it... unfortunately it's being spammed on every global. It is an amp, am I handling amp buffs wrong - do they exist in some other space, I couldn't find one?

			if (SpellController.CanCast("Power Link") && Me.InnateResource >= 350 && !Me.HasBuff("Power Link"))
				return "Power Link";

Help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

It may work with SpellController.BuffCount(string buffName) != 0, if not, I'll rewrap HasBuff for you since the original one is hit or miss!

 

[themarketguy]

didn't seem to work as: SpellController.BuffCount("Power Link") != 0

Perhaps I misunderstand the syntax, in this case now it doesn't cast it at all.

 

[Deathdisguise]

didn't seem to work as: SpellController.BuffCount("Power Link") != 0

Perhaps I misunderstand the syntax, in this case now it doesn't cast it at all.

God I was off my rocker last night. (In my defense, it was Canada Day and I came home not at 100% . Use == 0 instead, hahaha.

 

[themarketguy]

oh man, I feel pretty dumb for not catching that myself... yes, that does seem to work right.

now i just need to figure out a way to overcome the input limit so that I can be sprinting around while still maintaining agility combat.

 

[Deathdisguise]

if (SpellController.HasAMP("WhateverItIsCalled"))
    GameManager.Movement.Sprint(false);

Give that a go.
(The 'false' is bool Stop, it's misleading, I know!)

 

[themarketguy]

yeah, that works, full time sprint basically while in combat, makes kinetic drive trigger to help keep KE building, this is looking up. Thanks!

 

[themarketguy]

Well, I've toyed with it for a bit and the combo works pretty darn well, power link and kinetic drive... power link is maintained fairly well. It's a common combination for dps warrior build as well, you may be interested in adding these to your warrior class base at the top of the full dps... up to you but I'll be using them in a few levels. basically you just move yourself for a moment every few moments to help keep KE up while power link gives you a big damage buff while it remains active.

			if (SpellController.HasAMP("Kinetic Drive"))
				GameManager.Movement.Sprint(false);
		
			if (SpellController.CanCast("Power Link") && Me.InnateResource >= 350 && SpellController.BuffCount("Power Link") == 0)
				return "Power Link";

 

[themarketguy]

Last thought I have for the night is the following warrior addition, for the use of Stance: Onslaught against superior+ mobs. I'd like some opinion on improving the positioning and logic of this slightly so that it's only really used when appropriate and not over used, presently I've placed it at the head of the routine, and it works, but it seems like it's used when the cooldown of rampage really should be 3500 or less.

			if (Me.CurrentTarget != null && Me.CurrentTarget.HealthPercent >= 35 && Me.CurrentTarget.RankRaw >=5 && SpellController.CanCast("Stance: Onslaught") && SpellController.Cooldown("Tremor") > 3250 && SpellController.Cooldown("Rampage") > 4000)
				return "Stance: Onslaught";

 

[Deathdisguise]

I've put a lot of thought into Onslaught, and a smart way to use it, and ultimately I've decided that target based decisions are on hold until (if) the Preview Telegraph API comes into play, but to answer your request:

Check if current target is MoO, Superior, and you can cast Onslaught:
1. Burn all resettable CDs. (typically will just be a Tremor)
2. Cast Onslaught
3. Business as usual.

 

[Palenie]

Could you make it so warrior dps routine uses whirlwind?

 

[themarketguy]

latest update in the repo had whirlwind

            if (SpellController.CanCast("Whirlwind") && Me.InnateResource > 900)
                return "Whirlwind";

those are the requirements.

 

[Deathdisguise]

latest update in the repo had whirlwind

            if (SpellController.CanCast("Whirlwind") && Me.InnateResource > 900)
                return "Whirlwind";

those are the requirements.

Indeed! It was added 2~(?) days ago! It's still a little iffy though, getting a wrap around channeled spells is a bit annoying.

 

[Palenie]

Indeed! It was added 2~(?) days ago! It's still a little iffy though, getting a wrap around channeled spells is a bit annoying.

yeah it doesnt seem to work.


EDIT: It does work, but like 50% of the time he cancels its channel. But for now i think its pretty decent! I'd change the && Me.InnateResource > 900) to > 500 thou, i feel it has a better uptime and just feels a bit smoother.