H
HB4529U73
Guest
I botted on 5 accounts on my laptop, played on my mainaccount meanwhile on another computer. all bots banned not the main acc. SO its clearly not IP. more like mac-adress
I botted on 5 accounts on my laptop, played on my mainaccount meanwhile on another computer. all bots banned not the main acc. SO its clearly not IP. more like mac-adress
I think I remember some kind of lawsuit about this, where it was stated that blizzard is not allowed to scan your entire computer.
You've studied law or are you just saying stuff here?
I think I remember some kind of lawsuit about this, where it was stated that blizzard is not allowed to scan your entire computer.
You've studied law or are you just saying stuff here?
You're forced to visit their web site, thus you're meant to read up their ToS and EULA. If you "activate" the game, you accepted the said and agree to be bound to it. If you didn't bother looking it up, its your fault. The "notices" (the small books in the cases of copies) also redirect you to the web sites for ToS and EULA.In Germany iE is a law, that says, that a EULA or TOS or what so ever a software publisher throws at you, is only valid if you can read this whole thing BEFORE you buy it. So that isnt the case, so all this crap isnt valid for us.
And besides this, an AGB, EULA etc. does not stand above the law.
Btw for our fellow German people:
Zumindest bei kostenpflichtiger Software ist es in Deutschland so, dass eine EULA nur dann rechtsg?ltig ist, wenn sie vor dem Kauf vollst?ndig einsehbar ist, was wohl in den allerwenigsten F?llen zutrifft, da so viel Text einfach nicht auf die Packung passt.
Von daher ist es mir herzlich egal was da steht, die Hersteller schneiden sich damit nur ins eigene Fleisch wenn sie es ?bertreiben.
Therefore you could even challenge EVERY ban as being not valid, because of that law, at least in Germany and only in Theory, dont know how many "sub laws" are connected to this crap.
You're forced to visit their web site, thus you're meant to read up their ToS and EULA. If you "activate" the game, you accepted the said and agree to be bound to it. If you didn't bother looking it up, its your fault. The "notices" (the small books in the cases of copies) also redirect you to the web sites for ToS and EULA.
I've searched online for this info and never found anything, tho I've heard it referred to many times on this forum. Does anyone have a link to any real info about this lawsuit and the outcome?I think I remember some kind of lawsuit about this, where it was stated that blizzard is not allowed to scan your entire computer.
Its absolutely clear now that they ban by IP, and if they receive appeal, then they perform deeper check which account was doing what, everyone who is denying that is a fool. Its also obvious that they target exclusively farmers, BG and questing are safe as ever. The question is what do they are checking after someone appeal, do they have automatic script for that, or they are manually peering through some basic statistics like hours online, charcters activity etc (the fact that they let go questing account suggests former, i doubty that they would willingly let go someone who was botting even without 72h suspension). Second important question is if they are mainly banning by script, or by player reports, or both equal.
and plz ppl. u need to stop posting this. we all know it and it's not about crying because we lost accounts or blaming hb for the bans. we're all sitting in the same boat and just try to find out if there is something new and if the banning methods have changed.But this still stands:If you cant afford to lose the account, dont bot on it.
Botting is a risk, and no one should tell you otherwise.
Yeah, no. If you sign a contract with me that has a clause in it that says that I may legally kill you if you fail to live up to the contract, I'm still going to prison if I excercise the option and kill you. A contract can include any silliness that you want to put into it, but it cannot supercede the law of the state/country in which you play.Even if the law stated that you may not scan your RAM, Blizzard could still do it due to its HQ sitting in the US plus the fact that you agreed on it in the first place.
I don't remember any lawsuits regarding Blizzard and Warden. I do remember the massive outcry from not only the player base but from Web and software watchdog groups once spyware (Warden, although no one knew its name back then) was observed checking through every bit of memory that was in use and every window that was open on your computer. That was back late in 2005. Once the stink got strong enough Blizzard scaled back Warden so that it would scan only the memory that was actively being used by WoW.I've searched online for this info and never found anything, tho I've heard it referred to many times on this forum. Does anyone have a link to any real info about this lawsuit and the outcome?
Yeah, no. If you sign a contract with me that has a clause in it that says that I may legally kill you if you fail to live up to the contract, I'm still going to prison if I excercise the option and kill you. A contract can include any silliness that you want to put into it, but it cannot supercede the law of the state/country in which you play.