What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

[Plugin Addon] "Item Rules" with a file based scripting language

You win this round!

;)

Thanks for the updates as always!
 
Last edited:
I can't stop this from picking up the 2H Legendary Vigilance. I've got the rule set to trash all of them and yet all my bots are still stashing them. Anyone else having this issue?
 
I can't seem to get it to stop picking up 2h weps no matter what I try. I tried each 2h individually. Then I tried an across the board just

[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [BASETYPE] == "Weapon" && [TWOHAND] == "True" -> [IGNORE]

Still grabbin trash items like Polearms and 2h maces
 
I think there are safety rules at the bottom and it has some 2H stuff in there. I got rid of all those and I still get Vigilance all the time. Although they seem to be high rolled so I dunno....
 
damn crit chance must be worthless on rings...

// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | -- Ring
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | [MAXSTAT] == 200, [LIFE%] == 12,[ AS%] == 9, [CRIT%] == 6, [LOH] == 479,
// | [MAXONERES] == 60, [CRITDMG%] == 50, [ALLRES] == 80, [MINDMG] == 36,
// | [MAXDMG] == 104
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | [DMGFACTOR] == 38, [TOTRES] == 140, [AVGDMG] == 70
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [OFFSTATS] > 2
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [DMGFACTOR] > 19
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 49 && [DMGFACTOR] > 17
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 69 && [ALLRES] > 39 && [DMGFACTOR] > 15
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 89 && [ALLRES] > 39 && [DMGFACTOR] > 10 && ([LOH] > 149 || [LIFE%] > 5)
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 109 && [ALLRES] > 49 && [DMGFACTOR] > 9 && ([LOH] > 249 || [LIFE%] > 8)
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 129 && [ALLRES] > 69 && [DMGFACTOR] > 8 && [LOH] > 249 && [LIFE%] > 8
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 149 && [ALLRES] > 79 && [LIFE%] > 11
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTAT] > 199 && [VIT] > 0 && [TOTRES] > 135
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [TOTRES] > 135
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [LOH] > 450
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [THORNS] > 900
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [MF%] > 19 && [GF%] > 24
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRITDMG%] > 47
// trash rule
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" -> [TRASH]
 
Mossyboy said:
damn crit chance must be worthless on rings...

// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | -- Ring
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | [MAXSTAT] == 200, [LIFE%] == 12,[ AS%] == 9, [CRIT%] == 6, [LOH] == 479,
// | [MAXONERES] == 60, [CRITDMG%] == 50, [ALLRES] == 80, [MINDMG] == 36,
// | [MAXDMG] == 104
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
// | [DMGFACTOR] == 38, [TOTRES] == 140, [AVGDMG] == 70
// +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [OFFSTATS] > 2
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [DMGFACTOR] > 19
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 49 && [DMGFACTOR] > 17
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 69 && [ALLRES] > 39 && [DMGFACTOR] > 15
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 89 && [ALLRES] > 39 && [DMGFACTOR] > 10 && ([LOH] > 149 || [LIFE%] > 5)
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 109 && [ALLRES] > 49 && [DMGFACTOR] > 9 && ([LOH] > 249 || [LIFE%] > 8)
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 129 && [ALLRES] > 69 && [DMGFACTOR] > 8 && [LOH] > 249 && [LIFE%] > 8
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 149 && [ALLRES] > 79 && [LIFE%] > 11
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTAT] > 199 && [VIT] > 0 && [TOTRES] > 135
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [TOTRES] > 135
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [LOH] > 450
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [THORNS] > 900
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [MAXSTATVIT] > 0 && [DMGFACTOR] > 0 && [MF%] > 19 && [GF%] > 24
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRITDMG%] > 47
// trash rule
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" -> [TRASH]
Click to expand...
Is this the same on version 2?
 
yeah thats the newest one.

i added this in quickly. it will find some crappy ring but could also find gg rings.
ill add more when i get free time

[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRIT%] > 2 && [CRITDMG%] > 30
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRIT%] > 2 && [AS%] > 4

Also did the same with amulet seeing as they didnt have any crit chance ones. idk why this wouldnt be picking up tri rings & ammys : /
 
Last edited:
Mossyboy said:
yeah thats the newest one.

i added this in quickly. it will find some crappy ring but could also find gg rings.
ill add more when i get free time

[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRIT%] > 2 && [CRITDMG%] > 30
[QUALITY] == "Rare" && [TYPE] == "Ring" # [CRIT%] > 2 && [AS%] > 4

Also did the same with amulet seeing as they didnt have any crit chance ones. idk why this wouldnt be picking up tri rings & ammys : /
Click to expand...
Man... that's awful... we need this to be fixed ASAP as trinities rings [AIS,CC,CD] are too good to let it pass... PLEASE FIX THIS!
 
are you kidding?
what do you think are OFFSTATS and DMGFACTOR? read the readme
 
theatristformallyknownasG said:
Even using the "soft" rules I haven't picked up a rare for days :( are they not as soft as they appear ?

G
Click to expand...

Same for me using the medium ones, not sure whats going on and i aint got time to dig through the logs. but 10 bots not picking up any rares for days is infact rare
 
Can someone help me out. All I need is to keep all legendaries, loot rings, amulets and gloves.
 
Oink said:
Same for me using the medium ones, not sure whats going on and i aint got time to dig through the logs. but 10 bots not picking up any rares for days is infact rare
Click to expand...

I have gone back to Duck's rules for now. soft rules are supposed to keep all legendaries, it salavaged all the ones I found while at work today. The fact I have not had a single rare picked in 20000 items leads me to believe there is something wrong somewhere. Unfortunately the repoitory is down, so I can't find some old versions to play with.

I have a theory that the settings for giles based on 1.6.4 and 1.7.1.4 are screwed up, when you switch between something goes horribad. I will find the folders that save settings and delete and try again.

G
 
Last edited:
Andariel's Visage cannot be trashed ...... Create me RULE so it can trash it .dosent mater what proprieties it has just sell it to vendor ! ... i have tried all the rule combinations and It is not possible .
 
seems to love + min dmg. keeps shit rings with +40 min dmg that's worth 10k
 
Last edited:
hmm it also seems that the current itemrules tends to let db throw unhandled errors. The unified without ir2 works flawless, the one from the donators rep gives an error, though it continues to run without a problem just seems to be some unhandled exception


-edit- my bad this does not seem to be a problem of itemrules but of the unified version itself. or an issue with trinity and some of my installs, cant reall pinpoint it right now
 
Last edited:
parchet001 said:
Andariel's Visage cannot be trashed ...... Create me RULE so it can trash it .dosent mater what proprieties it has just sell it to vendor ! ... i have tried all the rule combinations and It is not possible .
Click to expand...
Same issue here. Andy's and friggin' Vigilance never get shredded/sold no matter what rules I put in place. Annoying....
 
this i get :(
[17:50:34.097 Q] [Trinity][CacheManagement]System.AccessViolationException: Could not read bytes from 00000008 [299]!
bei Zeta.MemoryManagement.ExternalProcessReader.ReadBytes(IntPtr address, Int32 count, Boolean isRelative)
bei Zeta.MemoryManagement.ExternalProcessReader.Read[T](IntPtr address, Boolean isRelative)
bei Zeta.Internals.Actors.ACD.[](ACD , Int32 )
bei Zeta.Internals.Actors.ACD.GetAttribute[T](Int32 attribute)
bei Zeta.Internals.Actors.ACD.GetAttribute[T](ActorAttributeType attributeType)
bei Zeta.Internals.Actors.DiaUnit.get_IsInvulnerable()
bei GilesTrinity.GilesTrinity.RefreshGilesUnit(Boolean AddToCache)
bei GilesTrinity.GilesTrinity.RefreshStepMainObjectType(Boolean& AddToCache)
bei GilesTrinity.GilesTrinity.CacheDiaObject(DiaObject freshObject)
bei GilesTrinity.GilesTrinity.RefreshCacheMainLoop()

the bot works but i get this often :/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top