What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit API Documentation
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic

Demonbuddy and CPU usage

K

kaime

New Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I've noticed that a single bot attached to D3 consumes more resources than the client itself (4% for Diablo, 6% for DB on average for me)
Can someone explain why? Is there a way to decrease it, or devs can optimize and clean the code for better performance?
 
Because you're looking at computer usage of a game that is not functioning compared to the computer usage of a game that is functioning at a higher level. More going on = more CPU usage...... this is pretty much common sense I'd assume so I am not sure how to break it down any other way for you to understand.
 
i0wnzurazz said:
Because you're looking at computer usage of a game that is not functioning compared to the computer usage of a game that is functioning at a higher level. More going on = more CPU usage...... this is pretty much common sense I'd assume so I am not sure how to break it down any other way for you to understand.
Click to expand...

Uhm.. did you even read his original post? He's talking about Demonbuddy cpu usage vs Diablo 3 usage. He's saying demonbuddy is taking more cpu than the actual game (thats doing graphics processing)... It seems a little wonky to pretty much anybody.
 
i0wnzurazz said:
Because you're looking at computer usage of a game that is not functioning compared to the computer usage of a game that is functioning at a higher level. More going on = more CPU usage...... this is pretty much common sense I'd assume so I am not sure how to break it down any other way for you to understand.
Click to expand...

I don't understand what are you talking about. You can't minimize diablo client for bot to work thus running in a background it still consumes as much % as it would if you play it normally.
 
My fault - I thought he meant the CPU usage on the game went up when DB was attached and running.

DB is a huge resource hog - its been discussed before. I preferred IB because it did not increase CPU usage after injection.

At first I thought IB was the main reason a lot of people were getting banned but it appears equal amount of DB users are being banned daily - I feel that both bots are equally as safe now lol.
 
kaime said:
I've noticed that a single bot attached to D3 consumes more resources than the client itself (4% for Diablo, 6% for DB on average for me)
Can someone explain why? Is there a way to decrease it, or devs can optimize and clean the code for better performance?
Click to expand...
Yeah, mine DB also takes more CPU resources then Diablo 3 itself, on average it takes 1.5/2x times more.
 
It's eating resources like monkey eat banana.

Most of the act 3 profiles lags my diablo client to death (30+ monsters on screen)
 
turing said:
try turning off logging if you don't need it
Click to expand...

It doesn't help at all, or the difference is so tiny you won't notice.
BTW I am currently running 7 client+bots on various profiles/plugins/lootrules from AGB to Core and each and every bot consume the same % of CPU and memory.
So I can definitely say that profiles/plugins does not affect the performance.

I would be really glad if any of the DEVs elaborate a bit on this matter.
Can we expect any improvements in the future?
 
kaime said:
It doesn't help at all, or the difference is so tiny you won't notice.
BTW I am currently running 7 client+bots on various profiles/plugins/lootrules from AGB to Core and each and every bot consume the same % of CPU and memory.
So I can definitely say that profiles/plugins does not affect the performance.

I would be really glad if any of the DEVs elaborate a bit on this matter.
Can we expect any improvements in the future?
Click to expand...
Let's get our bot to run random dungeons first ;>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top