What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

[Guide/Setup] Crusader solo setup: 200B exp per hour no grift key burn

This was a test to find out the PEAK, why the hell i need reflection pool on? I always can multiply it by 1,25, and i wrote it in my post, you should be more attentive when reading my posts.

And many people have shown to greatly outperform your test of peak, yet you still continue to call everyone liars instead of trying some fresh installs or settings or making sure everything is correct on your end.
 
long arm of the law does nothing when In-Geom is up

In-Geom up time is not 100%, and long arm will increase your seepd a bit more.

but more CDR gives more overall spam. I run just over 65% CDR, and I'd run more if I could. There is no point for this setup where CDR becomes useless.

An example is that with High CDR when you kill an elite pack, your in-geom proc will reset your iron thorns and bombardment right away. If the elite pack died fast enough relative to your CDR, it will cast another "free" iron-skin+bombardment, and have it up again for the next physical cycle.

Even with 61,5% CDR without fevor you will be able spam iron+bomb twice in a row while in-geom is UP. As i said before: only thing that Fevor affect is Akarat's uptime.

Anyway both passive effect is neglegible and better to use best stats amulet that you have, unless you have really good hellfire amulet which is pain to get and not worth efforts. Countess julia's cameo is the best when you pushing with bot, because arcane is the most often reason of bot deaths, for exp farm is not really matter what amulet you use, the stats on it is the only case.

And many people have shown to greatly outperform your test of peak, yet you still continue to call everyone liars instead of trying some fresh installs or settings or making sure everything is correct on your end.

You still didn't show a sample of 100+ runs, and please start your first run with no reflection pool bonus on your character if you finally will manage to do so.
 
Last edited:
This was a test to find out the PEAK, why the hell i need reflection pool on? I always can multiply it by 1,25, and i wrote it in my post, you should be more attentive when reading my posts.
If you want to find out the PEAK with 73 runs , why don't you need reflection pool??? Is your brain broken?
In order to get a run with 400b/h you have to finish(with reflection pool active) GR72 with good densinty in 4 mins 22 secs (town run included). Even if it's posible, it will be extreme rare.
Keetsune is obviously running something wrong, but he is content to spread misinformation instead of trying to solve it, I suggest you ignore him.
Capeman,you're right. I guess Keetsune learned math from his PE teacher!
 
Last edited:
If you want to find out the PEAK with 73 runs , why don't you need reflection pool??? Is your brain broken?
Because i always can multiply it by 1,25, and i don't need to waste time on naphalem runs while i testing. Only person who have problem with math here is you, who can't even multiply %)
 
You still didn't show a sample of 100+ runs, and please start your first run with no reflection pool bonus on your character if you finally will manage to do so.

I cannot go back in time and start the run with zero pools. I can however take a screenshot of the results from a point where the bot has 2 pools of reflection up. starting and ending with zero pools is the same as starting and ending with 2 pools.

And again, If many people show peaks way higher than you. even if they ran only 10 times, what does it matter? if they let it run for 100 runs the peak could only be higher potentially. you are doing something wrong
 
Last edited:
I cannot go back in time and start the run with zero pools. I can however take a screenshot of the results from a point where the bot has 2 pools of reflection up. starting and ending with zero pools is the same as starting and ending with 2 pools.
ye ye right, keep posting your lucky streaks.
 
ye ye right, keep posting your lucky streaks.

lucky streaks explain why several other people have posted peaks way way higher than you?

There is a metric ton of evidence that you are simply doing something wrong on your end, but sure continue to call everyone liars and lucky that's super productive :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
lucky streaks explain why several other people have posted peaks way way higher than you?
Ye and you ignoring many results that is worse than mine. Just ppls don't like posting bad results maybe? But in other hand they eager to share outstanding results. Temptation to show off is the nature of humans.
 
Ye and you ignoring many results that is worse than mine. Just ppls don't like posting bad results maybe? But in other hand they eager to share outstanding results.

Because people posting bad results has been shown every time but your case to lack gear pieces, refuse to run the proper Grift level, or copied settings wrong.


Even if you think I am a liar, explain to me please:

If you are doing everything correct, why have so many people managed to post peaks that are so substantially higher than yours?
 
Last edited:
Because people posting bad results has been shown every time but your case to lack gear pieces, refuse to run the proper Grift level, or copied settings wrong.
You still refusing the facts:

1) Unlucky naphalem streaks with 0 pools
2) Bad density GR with: bad mobs which can't be killed with one bomb rotation: Primordial Scavenger, Deceivers; loads of shielder affix elites.
 
You still refusing the facts:

1) Unlucky naphalem streaks with 0 pools
2) Bad density GR with: bad mobs which can't be killed with one bomb rotation: Primordial Scavenger, Deceivers; loads of shielder affix elites.

Again you don't answer the question of how your peaks are just barely higher than some people's average.
 
Because people posting bad results has been shown every time but your case to lack gear pieces, refuse to run the proper Grift level, or copied settings wrong.?

Show your gear then.

Again you don't answer the question of how your peaks are just barely higher than some people's average.

Simple luck. And wtf is that "again"? I'm trying to answer to every of your questions, not like you who refusing the facts, which should drop you exp/h by a lot and still stick to one of your lucky streak representing it like permement result, this is the only reason why i'm still here in disscusion with you.
 
Last edited:
You know what? fuck this.

I tried to post something helpful for the community, and you turned this thread into a giant flame war. I don't need to wake up to your accusations every morning.
 
I would never show my gear, it would be super easy for someone to identify me from the leaderboards and report me for botting.

What a nonsense lol, everyone here don't care about you that much to waste time to identy you in order to ban. Even blizz don't care about you.

Here the current facts about us:

1) You still didn't show 100+ runs sample. I have my own thoughts why you still didn't that, but everyone willing to think as they want.
2) You don't want to show your gear. I have my own thoughts why you still didn't that, but everyone willing to think as they want.
3) I'm still can't beat 35bil exp single run and 320bil exp/h single run, first stat is not gear depended, while second maybe. I consider this like luck moment and this is a matter of time and have no impact on average exp/h gain, since i bet that my gear is not worse than yours. You may consider this as lack of my gear, but i will gladly share my gear when i will see yours.
 
I tried to post something helpful for the community.
I'm agree, you posted very usefull information with no doubt, and believe me i appreciate that, with your info i improved my exp gain by a lot. But you also posted lucky streak sample and representing it like "regular" and real "average", this is the only thing that i'm trying to reveal.
 
I'm agree, you posted very usefull information with no doubt, and believe me i appreciate that, with your info i improved my exp gain by a lot. But you also posted lucky streak sample and representing it like "regular" and real "average", this is the only thing that i'm trying to reveal.

Well congratulations, your complete lack of self awareness managed to get a product you admit to appreciate discontinued, feels good right?
 
What a nonsense lol, everyone here don't care about you that much to waste time to identy you in order to ban. Even blizz don't care about you.

Here the current facts about us:

1) You still didn't show 100+ runs sample. I have my own thoughts why you still didn't that, but everyone willing to think as they want.
2) You don't want to show your gear. I have my own thoughts why you still didn't that, but everyone willing to think as they want.
3) I'm still can't beat 35bil exp single run and 320bil exp/h single run, first stat is not gear depended, while second maybe. I consider this like luck moment and this is a matter of time and have no impact on average exp/h gain, since i bet that my gear is not worse than yours. You may consider this as lack of my gear, but i will gladly share my gear when i will see yours.

I dunno why you're being so belligerent about it. He would probably have been willing to help you fix whatever it is you're doing wrong.

Even IF his results were a little modified or exaggerated, which they aren't, who fuckin cares. The method is clearly way better than everything else currently available for crusader, even for people not running it efficiently like you.
 
Well congratulations, your complete lack of self awareness managed to get a product you admit to appreciate discontinued, feels good right?
Can't understand why you so agressive, i never was agressive in my statements. I'm trying to operate with facts, while i didn't saw the fact from you except of couple of low sample lucky streaks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top