If you image blizzard trying to catch bots using various methods including monitoring of similar patterns. Then take into account trying to do that on 5.6 million accounts - that's a lot of data to sift through. However take away all x64 users as you know they aren't using at least HB, you are left with a far smaller fraction of data to go through and therefore will be easier to possibly find some similar pattern.
If that is even how they do it. Then by you logic, blizzard would only ban people running 32bit wow, there are other bots and hacks that work on 64 bit version of wow. So only focusing on 32 bit wow would be a stupid idea, sinse you would only get x% of *****ers. Where if you checked out both 32 and 64 bit you would get more *****ers. Remember Blizz is a huge company that got loads of $$$. I dont see why they cant handle information from 10m people
Soapbox users got banned and they use a 64 bit client, that alone is living proof that 64 bit gives you absolutely no extra security than 32 bit would.
Soapbox users got banned and they use a 64 bit client, that alone is living proof that 64 bit gives you absolutely no extra security than 32 bit would.
Soapbox users got banned and they use a 64 bit client, that alone is living proof that 64 bit gives you absolutely no extra security than 32 bit would.
Hello for soapbox i'm using it the reason of ban is from Dev they say it 2 days ago it's FIX
For soapbox it's not a banwave like HB ^
thx you for your Answer
They USED both 32 and 64 , but have since dropped 32 after the recent bans
Yeah it's fixed and I'm not wanting to discuss competitors in any depth, but I was just stating that 64 bit systems are no more robust in terms of security against being detected by blizzard than that of a 32 bit one.
not really looking to argue but what do you base this statement on?
The only real benefit for me of using a 64bit bot, would be that I could use tmorph.