What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

20 bots + on this system ??? i7 3930 oc

trungnp

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i have plan to build a system can run 20 bots +

i7 3930k OC 4.3 ~ 4.5 ghz
ram 32 gb ddr3 buss 1600
main x79 ?? for OC and low money
vga 7970 (or 7950) 3gb ddr5
ssd 120g ??? (we can use d3starter)
psu 750w

what do u think ?
any experience ?

and how about dual Xeon (low price) ??
 
Last edited:
20 bots? seriously seriously? Im just waiting for next banwave to leave definitely. Game is dead
 
i have plan to build a system can run 20 bots +

i7 3930k OC 4.3 ~ 4.5 ghz
ram 32 gb ddr3 buss 1600
main x79 ?? for OC and low money
vga 7970 (or 7950) 3gb ddr5
ssd 120g ??? (we can use d3starter)
psu 750w

what do u think ?
any experience ?

i7 3770K oc 4.4ghz
ram 32gb ddr3
7950 3gb ddr5
ssd 120

i can run about 12 only on low details.
i think i could run more if i use some programs that may be found here to do graphic worse, but 20? Rather hard to do.
 
I can run 12 on FX-8350, 16GB memory and GTX 560 Ti 2GB. Pretty sure there's gotta be possible to run more on i7 system with 32 GB of memory.
 
Nopes. Ram wouldn't be his bottleneck, cpu usage woud be. 14-15? possible, but with reduced db settings like tps and such, with worse individual returns per bot. 20? I honestly don't think that's possible with an under 800 euros cpu. It would be better just to buy 2 slightly lower budget comps and set 25 bots.
 
What i meant was, that i can run 12 instances on 8 core AMD cpu OCed to 4.6 with 20 TPS each. Why wouldn't an i7 3770K with the same OC be able to run more games, comparing pure CPU usage? Haven't got the chance to try that out for myself, but always thought Intel CPUs are much better.
 
What i meant was, that i can run 12 instances on 8 core AMD cpu OCed to 4.6 with 20 TPS each. Why wouldn't an i7 3770K with the same OC be able to run more games, comparing pure CPU usage? Haven't got the chance to try that out for myself, but always thought Intel CPUs are much better.

so maybe it will run 15 instances without breaking efficiency... but that's still far away from 20.
 
so maybe it will run 15 instances without breaking efficiency... but that's still far away from 20.

Even 15 would need a bigger OC than 4.6 imo. And it wouldn't be an easy overclock, a professional overclock would be required. That's if you intend to keep the tps at 8-10.
Of course, 15 bots are indeed possible in a i73770k , but with continuous 100% cpu usage and massively reducing efficiency. Not worth it in my opinion.
 
I looked into 3930 before and figured it to have a capacity of +40-50% of a 3770k oc @ 4.6.

I run 12 on 3770k's @ 10tps/16fps fairly stable and they produce at an acceptable level. i would expect a 3930 to do the same at 16-18 (18 being absolute max) with the same setup.

As others have stated... after pricing the mobo and other stuff you are better off breaking the build in 1/2 and using 2x 3770k's to run 22-24 clients in a lot of peoples opinion including mine.


"What i meant was, that i can run 12 instances on 8 core AMD cpu OCed to 4.6 with 20 TPS each. Why wouldn't an i7 3770K with the same OC be able to run more games, comparing pure CPU usage? Haven't got the chance to try that out for myself, but always thought Intel CPUs are much better. "

8350 is roughly comparable to 3770k from what i can tell in terms of bots... difference being chip life and power consumption. i think 3770k outshines 8350 in lower thread tasks.
 
What i meant was, that i can run 12 instances on 8 core AMD cpu OCed to 4.6 with 20 TPS each. Why wouldn't an i7 3770K with the same OC be able to run more games, comparing pure CPU usage? Haven't got the chance to try that out for myself, but always thought Intel CPUs are much better.

Which CPU is that? Is it a dedicated machine?

I have 8 core amd FX-8120 (no overclocking as i am having fans on silent mode, i am sleeping in same room). I am having 6 instances and the CPU is at 50-70%. I use this machine as my own. I have modified d3 prefs. You think i could run up to 10 ? Right now i believe 8 is max if i calculated right, and even that i would probably need to kill 2 instances if i wanna play other game.
 
i'm using a system : 3770k oc 4.5ghz + 660 hawk (non Ti) + 24 gb ram (2x8gb + 2x4gb)
running 8 bot 24/7 , also i watch video or tomp raider or starcraft2 HotS or WoW with 8 bot still runing - cpu usage only 60% - 70% never seen higher

i have seen 26 bots on my friend Ailenware laptop , max system (3960x - 64gb ram - 690), so i think 3930k with OC can carry 20 bots.

any one thinking about Dual Xeon (low one) ?
 
I looked into 3930 before and figured it to have a capacity of +40-50% of a 3770k oc @ 4.6.

Really 40% more?? I mean, really???? That would be quite a jump....it that progress is true , certainly 20 bots would be viable then...even price for the lowest range 3930 doesn't exceed medium range 3770k +40%, so it would be a good invest considering the rest of the system could host a bigger number of bots...
 
Last edited:
lol ... from my own personal experiences

i5 3570k ... 6-8 (6 more likely) bots absolute max with decent settings

i7 3770k ... 12-14 (12 more likely) absolute max with decent settings.

i7 3930k .... id expect 18-20 (18 being likely)

3570k - 4 core no HT
3770k - 4 core with HT = 8 core~ 100% gain over 3570 as was true with my bots.
3930k - 6 core with HT = 12 core ~ 50% projected gain over 3770k @ 8 core ... 12 x .5 is 6 + original 12 is 18.

I dont see wtf the big deal is on 40%? It seems pretty elementary to me.... logic shows to expect atleast a 50% gain with the gain of 50% more cores....???

3770k $329.00
3930k $569.00

Build a rig for both and compare yourself. Both systems will more than likely come out around $90/client in hardware using my numbers. You can get it lower if you feel like skimping in places.

I think you guys are thinking of 40% overall performance in all task gains i guess ... but it should yield 50% in bot capacity none the less.
 
Back
Top