Which method of leveling do you use?

[Tanner]

I was just curious what methods of leveling characters everyone here uses!

1-60
60-70
70-80
80-85
85-90

I would love some input

 

[Marbles]

1-60 Kick's or Cava's questing profiles, AV
60-70 archaeology, dungeons, AV and Kick's
70-85 archaeology, Kick's and AV
85-90 Kick's or Cava's and archaeology

This is in order of most used -> least used, and I've leveled ~20 toons this way

 

[taurenguard]

1-85 Kicks profiles
85-90 BGbuddy

 

[Teveel]

1-80 RAF boost in a day, then questing/arch/bg mix.

 

[Mario27]

i use questing but it needs alot of monitoring because of the bugs sometimes but using an other revesion of kicks svn wil help to because im using an older version witch is worling really nice.

 

[bjsaust]

I use Cava's questing as high as it can go, then Kicks until 85 and then Cava again. Hadn't considered Archeology, is the XP that good from it that its better than questing? Or just less intervention needed?

 

[Teveel]

I use Cava's questing as high as it can go, then Kicks until 85 and then Cava again. Hadn't considered Archeology, is the XP that good from it that its better than questing? Or just less intervention needed?

Less intervention for overnighting, unfortunately good xp grind spots from cata due to CRZ are nearly useless.
Archbot means at least its getting something overnight, unsupervised.

 

[Inthehat]

1-80 - Kicks questing profiles
80-88 - BGbuddy
88-90 - Hand level (just to learn the class basics)/Kicks Questing

 

[Eloyn]

1-90 Kick's profiles

 

[Thatguy93]

1-90 Kicks, Usually 85-90 BG but my BG buddy is broken and and looks completely obvious.

 

[Tanner]

Thank you everyone for your input!

I was just curious myself, how efficient is 60-90 archaeology? I know it's probably not the fastest, but I hear it's the most AFK reliable. How long in /played would it take from 60-90 on average using arch?

 

[MrB]

I tend to only use archaeology between 70 and 80. Flying before 70 is too slow and I find the Cata quests go quicker.

 

[Teveel]

Don't think Arch scales well past level 84, to be honest its most effective with the fastest flying you can do @ respective levels, majority of time spent on Arch is moving from site to site.
There are plugins designed to speed that up by using things like hearthstones/deathgates/if mage teleports etc.
Personally while Arch is handy if you are in a position to check in on the bot every hour or so Questing is much much more effective.

 

[Thatguy93]

Don't think Arch scales well past level 84, to be honest its most effective with the fastest flying you can do @ respective levels, majority of time spent on Arch is moving from site to site.
There are plugins designed to speed that up by using things like hearthstones/deathgates/if mage teleports etc.
Personally while Arch is handy if you are in a position to check in on the bot every hour or so Questing is much much more effective.

at about 7 hours on the bot today, no breaks but 95% monitored and only at 65% of level 87-88 lol. There must be a quicker way!

 

[Teveel]

Yeah like I said it doesn't scale well at all, so I only use it when needed.
Personally I'd run a grind profile over Arch unless your on a high pop realm when its slightly more risky.
Several good spots for going 86-90 with grind.