What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit API Documentation
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic

what pc i must buy to run 12 + bots

Status
Not open for further replies.

KAZYKA

New Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
now i can run max 2 bot witch my old pc but need buy a new pc need run 12+ bots can u tell me stats that pc i need plx :) sry for crap english
 
If you are gonna have dedicated pc(meaning it will run only diablo 3 bots and never even browser or music) get 8 core AMD fx 8320 or fx 8350. If you wanna use your pc and still bot at the same time, get intel. Best i5 + very good heatsink+thermal paste and OC it as much as possible. Or just get an i7 and oc it slightly ;) GPU does not matter so much, but i think radeon hd 7850 is a very very well priced gpu for what it does.I recommend that. You will probably need MORE than 16 gb of ram as well, get any that says 1.5v and 1600 mhz (cl9/10)
 
Last edited:
^^ mate you sure about AMD fx 8350 running only 3 bots? 'cause i think it can run *maybe even 4 times more toons than 3 with slight OCing and installing aftermarket cooler and so! but i could be wrong ofc
 
Lol I don't think ad3ddd really knows what hes talking about.

First off an 8 core AMD is going to be a damn good processor, I have the 8350 and I'm able to handle 3 diablos and 4 wow clients perfectly fine.
And if you're going for multi-gaming, then don't get an i5, oh my god why. No reason, its stupid, get the i7 and thank me later.
1600MHz only for RAM? Uhm, I'd suggest at least 1866 MHz, if not higher.
 
i7 + OC.
2600k @ 4,8 = 10bots and 60persent load.
Trash AMD and i5 - i sell i5 2500k and buy i7. It's AWESOME!
If u need 15+ bots = buy i7 six cores like 3960K.
 
^^ mate you sure about AMD fx 8350 running only 3 bots? 'cause i think it can run *maybe even 4 times more toons than 3 with slight OCing and installing aftermarket cooler and so! but i could be wrong ofc
Where do i say it is going to run 3 games? OP asks for 12 instances of d3 + 12 instances of DB. All i am saying is that the flagship AMD CPU will handle the bots, but i am not so sure it will be able to handle anything else at the same time. Read my post carefully.
 
Lol I don't think ad3ddd really knows what hes talking about.

First off an 8 core AMD is going to be a damn good processor, I have the 8350 and I'm able to handle 3 diablos and 4 wow clients perfectly fine.
And if you're going for multi-gaming, then don't get an i5, oh my god why. No reason, its stupid, get the i7 and thank me later.
1600MHz only for RAM? Uhm, I'd suggest at least 1866 MHz, if not higher.

I think Serux has no clue what he is talking about.

First off, i am suggesting fx 8350 for 12 instances of d3 + DB; NOT for 3 or 4. Read carefully pls. Difference in price is significant, and well oced i5 (best available, forgot the exact name k37...) blows away 8core amd, especially for gaming. Also i am pretty sure intel cpus will handle different tasks while botting better. Let me give you an example. When i have 8 instances of d3 + db running on my fx 6300 and open Chrome to play FLASH, it will start lagging occasionally and won't play the video(especially HD) that well. If by comparison, i am using the same CPU as dedicated, it will run fine with more instances of d3(but i won't be able to use it for anything else beside that).
Then the memory- there is literally no difference between 1600 and 1866 rated sticks of RAM (provided they are the same, just the RATED frequency being different). Moreover, there is not difference between memory operating at 1600 and 1866 in terms of gaming.

Personally tested that on different mobos and cpus, some of the best DIMMs available. I got G.skill ripjaws X 1866 blue sticks and they work ABSOLUTELY the same as my buddy's Patroiot viper 1600 sticks. LITERALLY no difference whatsoever. Not to mention saying 1600 is worse than 1866 is retarded, because 1600 with lower, tighter timings will outperform 1866 with higher, looser timings in almost any situation, save for a bandwidth benchmark.
NOT to mention, that by having an AMD cpu you are not in the best position to talk about memory frequency, since amd only rates their cpus to be able to use UP TO 1866. Go higher? Why on earth would he buy a 2133 rated sticks for twice the price.. Did you even read the original post? He wants 12 + bots = 32 gb of ram(16 not enough, logical think is to get 32). Do you even know how much 32 GB of 1866/2133 ram costs? What is wrong with you people?

In conclusion, Serux, learn to read and stop assuming. Have a nice evening
 
Last edited:
i7 + OC.
2600k @ 4,8 = 10bots and 60persent load.
Trash AMD and i5 - i sell i5 2500k and buy i7. It's AWESOME!
If u need 15+ bots = buy i7 six cores like 3960K.

Trash amd? Dude why pay twice more money for the same thing? Fx 8350 will handle that number of bots on a dedicated PC. It depends on the personal needs of an user. Stop being childish, please. Or do trees have money bills instead of leaves where you live? :cool: :cool:
 
well having i7 920 OC at 3,7GHz with Radeon 5750 and 12GB of ram 1333 and all i can get is 7 bots and cant play anythink else but can use for browsing etc. so i could say graph still matter imo. planing to buy atleast GTX480 for better performance in lower cost
 
well having i7 920 OC at 3,7GHz with Radeon 5750 and 12GB of ram 1333 and all i can get is 7 bots and cant play anythink else but can use for browsing etc. so i could say graph still matter imo. planing to buy atleast GTX480 for better performance in lower cost
It does matter,bro; you see, hd 5750 will run 8 bots at max. But this is a cheap GPU. For roughly the same money,tho, you can get HD 5830(eBay) that will kick the shit out of 12+ games :) and as you can see in my earlier post, i have suggested HD 7850, as it is prolly the best GPU considering price/performance. You can also always use a higher value of MipBias in d3prefs file, that will lower the graphic sharpness, thus relieving your GPU of additional load. CHeers
 
Last edited:
Cat fight! Why is everyone on the forums so moody lately? :O
 
Cat fight! Why is everyone on the forums so moody lately? :O

All i am trying is to help this dude to get the hardware he needs for less money;p i don't get why people who know nothing about that or do not care about costs even bother posting. Anyways, you are right. I am out xd
 


Somewhere i heard: ''picture says 1k words'' (or smth like this :P)

Can smbdy please exlplain why is intel better in this performance rang/tier except its lower wattage consuption?

I've made some calculations and in my country (which is not the best in the world tbh {all i say its in EU:}) also considering that both processors are running in stock values and working 24/7, i will spend ~58? more on elecricity bill in one year on AMD's FX 8350. So counter-wise, intel would ''pay off'' only in almost 2 years...


Calculations:

1kWh = 0.14?

i7 - 720h * 77W = 55440W = 55,4 kWh = 7.76?/month

FX - 720h * 125W = 90000W = 90kWh = 12.60?/month


^^all of this is my opinion ofc, and i could be wrong somewhere...
 


Somewhere i heard: ''picture says 1k words'' (or smth like this :P)

Can smbdy please exlplain why is intel better in this performance rang/tier except its lower wattage consuption?

I've made some calculations and in my country (which is not the best in the world tbh {all i say its in EU:}) also considering that both processors are running in stock values and working 24/7, i will spend ~58? more on elecricity bill in one year on AMD's FX 8350. So counter-wise, intel would ''pay off'' only in almost 2 years...


Calculations:

1kWh = 0.14?

i7 - 720h * 77W = 55440W = 55,4 kWh = 7.76?/month

FX - 720h * 125W = 90000W = 90kWh = 12.60?/month


^^all of this is my opinion ofc, and i could be wrong somewhere...

This benchmark photo is not exactly right. There is a bigger difference than this pictured. Check some better tests and direct comparisons such as this. Power consumption wise, you got it right, but these CPUs are made to be overclocked and this means raising the voltages, hence raising the consumption. So you need direct consumption comparisons of OCed cpus if you wanna know the details. For some things, tho(NOT gaming, but rendering, for example) i7 is much better than any amd(not talking server cpus).
 
there will be no pc you can buy to run 12 bots unless you buy a $1000-1500 computer and overclock it to nearly 5.0 ghz.

unless you want to run all your bots at 1 ticks per second.

you will also need more than 16gb ram, probably 32gb since you shouldnt use 8gb 8gb 8gb unless its single channel which will screw you out of performance



dont even consider a AMD cpu, after the bulldozer flopped, amd is going down the drain

if its not an i7 youre just wasting your money, the AMD quad cores dont compare to intels quad core and their "8 core" line are just failed products

R O F L, you made me laugh so hard. These are my favorite parts:
there will be no pc you can buy to run 12 bots unless you buy a $1000-1500 computer
and
dont even consider a AMD cpu, after the bulldozer flopped, amd is going down the drain
and ESPECIALLY
if its not an i7 youre just wasting your money, the AMD quad cores dont compare to intels quad core and their "8 core" line are just failed products

You, SIR, need to apply for a Nobel prize in something. Or or or.. why not in everything? ;)
 
Hey, Blista08, i'd love to see what you think of this last post :) that dude needs to put the bong down and come to Earth xD.. or .. Don't even consider this a planet, after the recession it goes down the drain, better go to Mars and start over xDDD

p.s. i am having so much fun with this topic, who knew so many people understand hardware
 
Last edited:
there will be no pc you can buy to run 12 bots unless you buy a $1000-1500 computer and overclock it to nearly 5.0 ghz.

unless you want to run all your bots at 1 ticks per second.

you will also need more than 16gb ram, probably 32gb since you shouldnt use 8gb 8gb 8gb unless its single channel which will screw you out of performance



dont even consider a AMD cpu, after the bulldozer flopped, amd is going down the drain

if its not an i7 youre just wasting your money, the AMD quad cores dont compare to intels quad core and their "8 core" line are just failed products

This post gave me cancer.
 
thanks my mind buddyforum user

im sure there are ton of people running bots on 300$ brokeback budget computers


the problem is statistics dont lie. go look at amd go look at intel, amd is in a bind, intel is raising throug hthe roofs

go look at benchmarks, wait, its all intel because AMD failed.


https://www.google.com/#hl=en&outpu...75,d.eWU&fp=e8eb7b2769946688&biw=1427&bih=759

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugex...75,d.eWU&fp=e8eb7b2769946688&biw=1427&bih=759


ouch stats hurt.



no it didnt but your shitty 500watt power supply and computer that you and your mom split 50/50 and put on a newegg credit card did

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. No comments on your logic. Or knowledge. Oh, and comparing CPUs by the performance of the manufacturer's stock SIMPLY IS THE BEST STATISTICAL APPROACH I HAVE EVER SEEN. TRUE STORY BRO !!!
 
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition Thuban 3.3GHz, 3.7GHz Turbo Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor HDE00ZFBGRBOX - Newegg.com

buy this amd six core cpu

wait you cant because its discontinued and amd is failing in sales/production/and competing vs intel gg

OH WAIT I CAN'T BECAUSE IT CAME OUT ON Dec 7, 2010 and it is old as hell???

Hhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahaahahahahahhhahahhahahahahahaha-CRY-CRY-CRY-ahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahhaHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top