These codes..

[flaZh]

These codes are very similar to java, is it java coding?

I've programmed some java a few years back. And going back to school to learn more of it now. Would be nice to know if these things are java or not.

 

[ClubbS]

It's c#. (fillah)

 

[flaZh]

Ok, cool. Thanks. I'll maybe have a look at sharp in some classes..

 

[Pedis]

i must admit im a noob at coding hell i havent coded a singel thing in my life but why is the bot in c# and not c++?

 

[erenion]

These codes are very similar to java, is it java coding?

I've programmed some java a few years back. And going back to school to learn more of it now. Would be nice to know if these things are java or not.

It is quite similar to java... Just less gimped.

i must admit im a noob at coding hell i havent coded a singel thing in my life but why is the bot in c# and not c++?

Why put it in c++? They are two very different languages.

 

[Pedis]

aint c++ just a update of c sharp? hmm it might look like i have gone wrong somewere...speaking of c++ and c sharp could it be done in theory to make it in ruby? or am i just compleatly of my rocker here?

 

[Ntsmarkv]

Ruby is a dynamic language whereas C# isn't. However, referring to C# as a static language really isn't right because you wouldn't apply that term to an entire language as you would to one of the dynamic variety. Ruby really differs from C# in that its code is not actually compiled into an intermediate executable form before it is run. Instead, Ruby has at its heart a text-driven interpreter. This means that the expressions and statements in a Ruby program are evaluated as the interpreter passes over them. In C#, you must first compile the code to an .exe or .dll file to be able to run it, and C# isn't exactly friendly in cases where you just want to automate something as simple as a command line.

 

[Pedis]

ahh ok thanks a lot for a sec after i posted i thurt i would get trolled to death over my non existence knowledge of coding