What's new
By:
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal

Sort of Proof that Player Reports can be an overriding factor of a Botting Ban

G

Giwin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
3,431
Reaction score
49
Confirmed. I was watching him but not when it happened. Too bad people have to be tools like that and report someone as a troll.
 
people get jealous and assume that because someone has more time to devote or is a superior player in whatever way which is causing them to level faster than they are.. theyre a bot. welcome to world of kidcraft.
 
so developers go out now and release aplugin that randomly reports VEREYBODY!! False positives for breaking this system!!
 
I have figured out their banning system, they get at least 2 player reports, look at the total hours played, if it's even then they go to the next step, if it's odd then they don't get banned. So if it's an even mount of hours played (evenly divisible by 2) they toss a coin, if it's tails they get banned but if it's heads they don't get banned.
 
So, the guy had played 65 hours straight and made it to level 81 with over 1000 witnesses claiming he never botted. Nevertheless, he got banned for "botting." This does not sound like a "player report" to me. It sounds more like a tripwire after 65 straight hours got him a temporary suspension. I laughed when I read one of the responses to this guy's ban:

"Leave Britney alone!"
 
lotrodude said:
So, the guy had played 65 hours straight and made it to level 81 with over 1000 witnesses claiming he never botted. Nevertheless, he got banned for "botting." This does not sound like a "player report" to me. It sounds more like a tripwire after 65 straight hours got him a temporary suspension. I laughed when I read one of the responses to this guy's ban:

"Leave Britney alone!"
Click to expand...

he has been doing this for the past two weeks on at least 4 different toon trying to go 1-90 in one sitting. some of those toons he played over 80 hours straight while doing the challenge
 
Ok. 80 hours without a tripwire ban disproves the idea of a 65 hour tripwire ban. It does seem more like a ban due to being reported.
 
what I wonder is if people are being banned just due to reporting whether its 2 reports or 5, whats to stop someone from being banned due to a douchebag or in this case, multiple douchebags reporting them just to spite them or cause they don't like that you say.... won a roll they wanted or beat them in a duel or pvp? Or do you mean that xx amount of player reports escalates it to being investigated? the real question then is.. how do they determine upon investigation whether its a bot or not? seems like a grey area and it should be 100% or they shouldn't be banning ppl, like it or not. sorta like all the false imprisonments that we are finding out about since dna. Anyone heard of any non negligible amount of ppl that have been banned and NOT botting?
 
klepp0906 said:
what I wonder is if people are being banned just due to reporting whether its 2 reports or 5, whats to stop someone from being banned due to a douchebag or in this case, multiple douchebags reporting them just to spite them or cause they don't like that you say.... won a roll they wanted or beat them in a duel or pvp? Or do you mean that xx amount of player reports escalates it to being investigated? the real question then is.. how do they determine upon investigation whether its a bot or not? seems like a grey area and it should be 100% or they shouldn't be banning ppl, like it or not. sorta like all the false imprisonments that we are finding out about since dna. Anyone heard of any non negligible amount of ppl that have been banned and NOT botting?
Click to expand...

On appeal, they can "dig deeper" which shows time online, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top