Logic?

[Mandori]

So i decided to buy this bot today, watched a few matches, played with a warrior, it was on my last 10 Hp the bot coulda casted execute (it was also the only card i had left in my hand) and save the game for me, instead it ends the turn without using it, why? the game ended with that minion getting buffed to 10 dmg and kill me.

 

[hudloom]

This is a bot, the beauty of this lies in the fact that you can go on with your life and do other tasks while the bot does take care about your game. Fire it up, let it do its job and check back after some hours and collect your daily 100g. It does not matter how nice it plays, it is all about the result.

It would be pointless as well to watch a robotic vacuum cleaner doing its job as he would do many things different than you would do manually and perhaps he is taking even longer to do it but if you come home after a long day work your floor is clean. It is all about what the bot delivers at the end and not how he does that.

 

[Mandori]

i dont mind tiny errors, but game deciding mistakes ?. take for example the bot for WoW, not many errors there, it delivers 100% imo

 

[NiklasNikke]

Keep in mind that it is in beta after all. Its logic is far from perfect and it will never be, but hudloom is spot on.

 

[steone]

i dont mind tiny errors, but game deciding mistakes ?. take for example the bot for WoW, not many errors there, it delivers 100% imo

you compare a bot which exists since many years with a bot which has only a month of existence.... where is the logic in that?

And you're comparing 2 games which has absolutely nothing in common in the game mechanics....

For me the bot does more than his job for a 1 month release : grinding my daily 100 gold + quest. I'm sure Arena will be soon better implemented and securing more win than actually... But even in the actual state it's nearly enough as you can get 140 gold minimum / day and the arena cost is 150. and with the rewards (even 0 win) you can even your small deficit...