OLG Hamburg - suit Blizzard vs Bossland GmbH
Main issue - World of Warcraft fairplay/contract breach/unfair competition
You may remember the hearing on 10th September 2014 and where i told you that the written ruling should be there around first week of November 2014. It actually arrived, a little late, yesterday.
It is all written in german, it is 60 pages long, it is a interesting read and everyone understanding german should have a read.
The ones of you that do not understand german, will wait a bit until i have made a summary in english. The very basics are:
* Blizzard lost 1/3 of the case, we lost 2/3 of the case at this court of appeals. The court of appeals allowed us to go to the Federal Court of Justice of Germany
* The court of appeals wrote in its last sentence the following by meaning: It finds that the case has fundamental meaning and that the Federal Court of Justice has to further define the basics.
We are no happy Panda, because in our oppinion there are much more things that we think should have been decided in our favour, but it seems this has to wait until 2016, thats is the year where we should have an appointment at the Supreme Court.
Meanwhile there was another hearing about my personal liability, which was not yet decided, there will be another appointment it seems, interesting fact is, that it is scimilar with another case and therefore the judges asked each party if they do not want to see how the decision in the other case goes on. Blizzard disagreed. Much more interesting would be the fact where two courts decide opposite to each other ... anyway
Main issue - World of Warcraft fairplay/contract breach/unfair competition
You may remember the hearing on 10th September 2014 and where i told you that the written ruling should be there around first week of November 2014. It actually arrived, a little late, yesterday.
It is all written in german, it is 60 pages long, it is a interesting read and everyone understanding german should have a read.
The ones of you that do not understand german, will wait a bit until i have made a summary in english. The very basics are:
* Blizzard lost 1/3 of the case, we lost 2/3 of the case at this court of appeals. The court of appeals allowed us to go to the Federal Court of Justice of Germany
* The court of appeals wrote in its last sentence the following by meaning: It finds that the case has fundamental meaning and that the Federal Court of Justice has to further define the basics.
We are no happy Panda, because in our oppinion there are much more things that we think should have been decided in our favour, but it seems this has to wait until 2016, thats is the year where we should have an appointment at the Supreme Court.
Meanwhile there was another hearing about my personal liability, which was not yet decided, there will be another appointment it seems, interesting fact is, that it is scimilar with another case and therefore the judges asked each party if they do not want to see how the decision in the other case goes on. Blizzard disagreed. Much more interesting would be the fact where two courts decide opposite to each other ... anyway