This is simply not true.
The arrival rate of ban reports is about the same as it always is. An analysis of the reports reveals that people simply can't give up their risky behaviors. E.g., botting 20+ hours, BGs and Arenas, etc.
...
cheers,
chinajade
Please Chinajade, allow me a question that I've always wondered about. When you state that the arrival rate of Ban reports is the same / similar as it has always been, you take into account that the number of people botting with Hb at the moment is so much lower than before?
Point being, if 100000 people were botting a year ago, and 10 people per day
reported their bans, it makes a 0,01% probability of being banned per day in an utopical , perfect system;
If the number of people botting atm is 20000 (this is an assumption too) , assuming the same arrival rate of ban reports, probability of being banned per day grows 5 times.
That is not considering the fact of ban waves that clear a huge percentage of the userbase. You gotta live with that and expect BL to do their best to counteract it. Which I think they do.
Small steps could have been taken along time to induce a sense of more security along the userbase. Renaming the .exe? We have been told for years that it wouldn't help at all. Yet now, all of a sudden, it is started to be done in DB and HearthBuddy. So, Blizzard started looking for the executable name right now? Was it that hard to implement? Would it have been that hard to implement 1 year ago?
Transparency and clarity go a long way for ensuring that your customers feel secure. There are some BL employees /collaborators who have frequently been honest with the Userbase. Mainly, Raphus and Hawker, imho. It would be amazing if you could follow that lead!
PD: it would also help not having to read the same fanboy posts from the same peopl of late in every single thread. Every-single-one. Gosh!