What's new
  • Visit Rebornbuddy
  • Visit Panda Profiles
  • Visit LLamamMagic
  • Visit Resources
  • Visit Downloads
  • Visit Portal
RebornBuddy Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Druid] 50% Win-Rate Ranked Deck (over 200 games played)

chrisngoftw

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
26
[Druid/All Classes] 50% Win-Rate Ranked Deck (over 500 games played)

This Druid deck has a 45-50% Win-Rate. It also works for all other classes, since it contains no class cards, just neutrals.
With the Auto-Concede function active, this deck should achieve a 65-75% Win-Rate.

I have tested it in over 500 games.

Note: At the start of the month, when ranks reset, you should expect the bot to perform at the lower win-rate. This is because there are better players on the ladder at this time.
Near the end of the month, the bot should perform at a higher win-rate. This is because all the better players have moved up the ladder.


Decklist
- If you do not have King Mukla, you can replace him with Harvest Golem or Sen'jin Shieldmasta. However, King Mukla is highly recommended as it can single-handedly win games.

Proof (56 games)

Note: Before each run, I always concede till I drop to rank 20. It is much faster to grind ranked wins this way.

Proof (44 games)

Proof (49 games)

Proof (61 games)

Proof (77 games)

Proof (Current Druid Wins)
- Started using the bot at about 100 wins. I will update this post with golden hero when I get there in 4-5 days.

Updated: Proof (Golden Druid)

Updated: ~ GIF VERSION ~

Enjoy!
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Your bot shows "ranked" mode, and yet the debug says "starting practice match with ai_normal_mage"?

EDIT: So i'm thinking you've been playing against the AI, and just toggled the pull down menu to Ranked for a quick screen shot.
Well, I guess I can take that as proof that it works in AI games too. Thanks!
 
Well, I guess I can take that as proof that it works in AI games too. Thanks!

Yeah, I'm sure that the deck is good, seems like a lot of positive feedback from the community. I haven't personally tested it because I am still working on a priest, but that will be done soon and I plan to use your deck to grind the druid.

I just hate it when people try to pass of fake stats to the community. It is stupid as hell to pretend that he got a 90% win rate, and I just don't understand why people try to post misinformation like that. But again, it is not to knock your deck, I just wanted to call him out on his bullshit.

Thanks for the contribution, looking forward to testing it soon :D
 
I just hate it when people try to pass of fake stats to the community. It is stupid as hell to pretend that he got a 90% win rate, and I just don't understand why people try to post misinformation like that. But again, it is not to knock your deck, I just wanted to call him out on his bullshit.

I'm sorry bro and to all other players, i did'nt saw i was playing on AI mode. (i change the mode on the start on bot but i think i did "start" before change the mode and i keep the bot play the games.)
I was AFK and not seeing the bot.

So sorry all.
 
I'm sorry that the win rate of this deck is horrible. 34.62% from over 100 ranked games. So I can't recommend it.
 
I was very skeptical of this deck at first, since it uses cards like shieldbearer, and amani berserker (amani berserker is a generally a good card, but the bot doesn't seem to use the enrage efficiently). But I gave it a shot and numbers don't lie:

LTYiONx.png


This is from a ~24hr session (I had to pause it in the middle to change some settings, is the reason why it says 10 hours).

I started from rank 20, I also don't have King Mukla. I replaced King Mukla with a Senji Shieldmasta. But a 48.17% win rate at 164 games is quite a feat. Thanks so much for your contribution, I will provide more updates if the bot doesn't crash :D

Note: the bot got me to rank 16 and consistently keeps me there, it generally loses a bunch at 16 but when it drops lower it brings me back to 16 again. Definitely not a bad deck, highly recommend it if you're playing druid.
 
So as this has no druid card, is this deck viable with other heroes? :-)
There are no druid class cards because they do not work well with the bot & deck. Other classes do have cards which I would put into the deck.

That being said, the answer is still yes, it is viable for other heroes.
 
I was very skeptical of this deck at first, since it uses cards like shieldbearer, and amani berserker (amani berserker is a generally a good card, but the bot doesn't seem to use the enrage efficiently). But I gave it a shot and numbers don't lie:

This is from a ~24hr session (I had to pause it in the middle to change some settings, is the reason why it says 10 hours).

I started from rank 20, I also don't have King Mukla. I replaced King Mukla with a Senji Shieldmasta. But a 48.17% win rate at 164 games is quite a feat. Thanks so much for your contribution, I will provide more updates if the bot doesn't crash :D

Note: the bot got me to rank 16 and consistently keeps me there, it generally loses a bunch at 16 but when it drops lower it brings me back to 16 again. Definitely not a bad deck, highly recommend it if you're playing druid.
The reasoning for Shieldbearer is that it protects your minions very well - 4 hp is difficult to remove and gives you a nice mana advantage if they use spells to remove it (e.g. Mage using a 2 mana frostbolt and 2 mana hero power is a total of 4 mana to remove the Shieldbearer (1 mana). Another reason is that it can be buffed up by Raid Leader / Defender of Argus. Also, it survives the early game clears such as consecration / lightning storm.

Armani Berserker makes it scary for your opponent to use clears such as consecration / lightning storm. They will think twice about clearing your board if they will have a enraged Armani Berserker to deal with. At its worst, it still trades for another 2 mana minion.
 
I'm sorry that the win rate of this deck is horrible. 34.62% from over 100 ranked games. So I can't recommend it.
Did you start from rank 20?

Can you provide a screenshot please? I've never seen such a low rate before.
 
Back
Top