Take a seat and learn a thing or two from someone who has been a part of this community for a while longer than yourself. When you start throwing rocks and attempting to use reputation on forums to get back at people all you do is make yourself look bad and the person with real sources come forward.
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-buddy-bots/legal/31986-meeting-lawyers.html
- See post 1 in thread breach of contract ( terms of use for the game client )
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-b...vs-bossland-4th-december-2012-lg-hamburg.html
- See fourth and fifth paragraph Blizzard attempting to tie end user contract TOS & EULA to breach of contract and legality of Honorbuddy functionality as a company
- See tenth paragraph about server memory issues and how the judge mandated proof of manipulation
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-b...trict-court-hamburg-28th-february-2012-a.html
- See paragraph seven of english version Blizzard again trying to enforce EULA & TOS on bossland as an illegal breach of contract
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-b...l-court-hamburg-decision-04-march-2014-a.html
-See first three paragraphs Court acknowledges the looseness of TOS & EULA binding on an end user
-See paragraph five The court acknowledges the game is not bound on purchase to EULA & TOS
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-buddy-bots/legal/149294-february-2014-update-legal.html
-See paragraph seven for purchasing a game and binding TOS & EULA to customers
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-buddy-bots/legal/167438-june-2014-update-legal.html
-See whole post about breach of TOS & EULA
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-buddy-bots/legal/177486-legal-september-2014-update-legal.html
-See
Munich, LG I - countersuit of Blizzard vs Bossland GmbH paragraphs
-See
OLG Hamburg - suit Blizzard vs Bossland GmbH the second paragrphs
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-buddy-bots/legal/189924-legal-november-2014-update-legal.html
-See whole post World of Warcraft fairplay/contract breach/unfair competition
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-b...-gmbh-won-lawsuit-blizzard-entertainment.html
- See paragraph seven on issues with EULA & TOS for virtually purchased products
https://www.thebuddyforum.com/the-b...ued-blizzard-read-court-news-july-2015-a.html
-See first six paragraphs on private vs personal vs public operation of the bot
-See also in first six the use of attatchment mechanics of HB to ban users based on EULA & TOS contract that has been proven fallable by previous posts
http://blog.bossland-gmbh.com/2016/from-years-back---year-2015-aka-shallow-water
-See paragraph twelve about lawsuit main issue
http://blog.bossland-gmbh.com/2016/bossland-gmbh-vs-blizzard-sas-05-o-195415
-See entire post about private vs public use of HB and wow
http://blog.bossland-gmbh.com/2016/blizzard-devastated-clutching-at-any-straw
-See entire post about moving the lawsuits to US in an attempt to alter the suit to target "Bossland Hacks"
http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/legal/eula
-See section
1. A) i - Online purchases may be made by anyone regardless of the form of purchase that has been made. No single person can be tied to such purchase.
1. A) ii - Blizzard has the "right" to obtain data from your person that is not game sensitive. They are taking in information about your set up and possibly other programs on your computer.
1. B) v - You own the property that are the physical disks and can be transfered ownership if you so choose. But Blizzard can still revoke access to servers by banning you for attaching HB (breach of consumer contract)
1. C) - cheeating provisions that target HB. HB uses a process that requires handling RAM data as the only means of interaction with WOW. This in and of itself is the grounds for the lawsuit. Blizzard has absolutely no grounds for banwaves (outside big data crunches for quests and public profiles) to ban users otherwise. In most countries the Company has to provide evidence of broken contract to refuse refunds, and Blizzard does not do so and continues to breach consumer contracts daily.
2. A) - everything is owned by Blizzard and can be revoked at any time for any reason without renumeration. This is a breach of consumer law in most countries. What does the consumer own after the purchase of a game liscense has been banned? The answer is nothing and needs to be addressed.
4.
CONSENT TO MONITOR.
WHEN RUNNING, A GAME MAY MONITOR YOUR COMPUTER'S RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (RAM) FOR UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY PROGRAMS RUNNING CONCURRENTLY WITH THE GAME. AN "UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY PROGRAM" AS USED HEREIN SHALL BE DEFINED AS ANY THIRD PARTY SOFTWARE PROHIBITED BY SECTION 1(C)(ii) ABOVE. IN THE EVENT THAT THE GAME DETECTS AN UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY PROGRAM, (a) THE GAME MAY COMMUNICATE INFORMATION BACK TO BLIZZARD, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION YOUR ACCOUNT NAME, DETAILS ABOUT THE UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY PROGRAM DETECTED, AND THE TIME AND DATE; AND/OR (b) BLIZZARD MAY EXERCISE ANY OR ALL OF ITS RIGHTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO THE USER. Additionally, certain Games include a tool that will allow your computer system to forward information to Blizzard in the event that the Game crashes, including system and driver data, and consent to Blizzard being able to receive this data.
This is Blizzards attempt to create their own rules and scare tactics for lateral monitoring of RAM processes. This is illegal in many countries under electronic privacy laws.
7. You cant sue Blizzard
10. B - Blizzard can terminate this contract at any moment even if its not legal.
So there you have it. From 2011 until now, the issue at hand has been and allways will be an issue of EULA & TOS saying you cant bot, users botting, blizzard breaching contracts and privacy laws to monitor RAM, and HB fighting the good fight to defend users right to privacy. The bot works on RAM manipulation and interpretation and that is the only way Blizzard can reasonably ban an account, this is the cause of the issue. Case closed.